UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Recognition of Forest Carbon Rights in Indonesia: A Constitutional Approach

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.19184/ejlh.v9i1.29331

Auteurs

Kenny Cetera

Année déclarée

2022

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:12:26.645326+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:12:26.645326+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

As a forest-rich nation, Indonesia has actively participated in carbon market governance like the REDD+ program. With the rapid expansion of REDD+ to address the effects of climate change, questions surrounding carbon rights have surfaced. This study aims to analyze the regulatory development of carbon rights in Indonesia and its impact on the community rights over forest resources by elaborating on the ideal carbon rights governance under a constitutional perspective. The study uses the normative method, which includes pertinent rules and supporting statements from climate change specialists. This study shows that carbon rights are defined broadly as the right to participate in forest carbon trading, although they require a government permit. There is no clear explanation of the relationship between land tenure and carbon ownership under the existing legislation, despite four permits to acquire carbon benefits: environmental service, social forestry, ecosystem restoration, and forest carbon administration permit. While the state can claim state control rights on certain commodities like carbon under Article 33 of the Indonesian Constitution, it also has to manage the distribution of carbon incentives based on the public interest. By facilitating the transfer of carbon rights under a carbon trading scheme while highlighting the government's role in sharing the benefits of carbon via a result-based payment scheme, Presidential Regulation 98/2021 contributes to more explicit control of carbon rights. All concerns related to carbon rights governance in Indonesia include complicated administrative and technical requirements for applying for a license, insecure land tenure due to overlapping claims, and unlawful encroachment in forest regions. Since land tenure issues remain unresolved, recognizing carbon rights as an alternative to recognizing marginal and community rights to forest resources could be viable. KEYWORDS: Environmental Regulation, Forest Carbon Rights, REDD+.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4280535457

DOI

10.19184/ejlh.v9i1.29331

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

ID

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt · Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v9i1.29331
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4280535457

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• Approaches to benefit sharing: A preliminary comparative analysis of 13 REDD+ countries · CITES
• Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly · CITES
• openalex:w2044767668 · CITES
• openalex:w2056525050 · CITES
• Taking Stock of Carbon Rights in REDD+ Candidate Countries: Concept Meets Reality · CITES
• openalex:w2241642284 · CITES
• openalex:w2530624518 · CITES
• openalex:w2546678925 · CITES
• openalex:w2566577246 · CITES
• openalex:w2962776714 · CITES
• Who Owns REDD+? Carbon Markets, Carbon Rights and Entitlements to REDD+ Finance · CITES
• openalex:w3126917518 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.