UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876

Auteurs

P. Pena · Sarmiento Barletti J.P..

Année déclarée

2023

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

book

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Key MessagesThere is much interest in jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ from new sources of climate finance and voluntary market mechanisms (e.g., LEAF Coalition). Given this interest, it is important to consider how national policy and regulatory frameworks can facilitate these jurisdictional approaches.Peru is a useful case study given that some of the country’s subnational governments have signed agreements for the sale of emission reductions from future REDD+ programmes in their jurisdictions.Currently, there are no policies or regulations for jurisdictional initiatives by subnational governments in Peru. However, the national government is developing rules under the National Registry of Mitigation Measures (Registro Nacional de Medidas de Mitigación, or RENAMI) and is considering guidelines for nesting initiatives using the Forest Reference Emissions Level (FREL) and the Forest Reference Level (FRL) for the Peruvian Amazon biome that could provide relevant rules for these types of jurisdictional initiatives.Legal uncertainties remain for jurisdictional approaches led by subnational governments. These include defining the areas within their jurisdictions that could be part of an initiative, whether the legal framework allows subnational governments to carry out carbon market transactions, and how they would receive and manage the proceeds of those transactions.This Infobrief reviews Peru’s current and forthcoming policy and legal framework to understand how subnational governments can be involved in jurisdictional approaches and to assess where the national government rules are heading.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4378419908

DOI

10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Livre

Types déclarés par les sources

book

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

PE

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Description bibliographique du livre

Disponibilité non établie

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2 · Document 3

• Document · http://dx.doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
• DOI · https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4378419908

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• CÓMO CREAR DERECHOS SÓLIDOS PARA LAS TRANSACCIONES SOBRE EL CARBONO FORESTAL: RETOS PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DEL PROGRAMA REDD+ EN EL PERÚ HOW TO CREATE SOLID RIGHTS FOR FOREST CARBON TRANSACTIONS: CHALLENGES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REDD+ PROGRAM IN PERU · CITES
• openalex:w2884734064 · CITES
• openalex:w36334707 · CITES
• openalex:w4312235401 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.