Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
- Authors
- P. Pena · Sarmiento Barletti J.P..
- Reported year
- 2023
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- book
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Key MessagesThere is much interest in jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ from new sources of climate finance and voluntary market mechanisms (e.g., LEAF Coalition). Given this interest, it is important to consider how national policy and regulatory frameworks can facilitate these jurisdictional approaches.Peru is a useful case study given that some of the country’s subnational governments have signed agreements for the sale of emission reductions from future REDD+ programmes in their jurisdictions.Currently, there are no policies or regulations for jurisdictional initiatives by subnational governments in Peru. However, the national government is developing rules under the National Registry of Mitigation Measures (Registro Nacional de Medidas de Mitigación, or RENAMI) and is considering guidelines for nesting initiatives using the Forest Reference Emissions Level (FREL) and the Forest Reference Level (FRL) for the Peruvian Amazon biome that could provide relevant rules for these types of jurisdictional initiatives.Legal uncertainties remain for jurisdictional approaches led by subnational governments. These include defining the areas within their jurisdictions that could be part of an initiative, whether the legal framework allows subnational governments to carry out carbon market transactions, and how they would receive and manage the proceeds of those transactions.This Infobrief reviews Peru’s current and forthcoming policy and legal framework to understand how subnational governments can be involved in jurisdictional approaches and to assess where the national government rules are heading.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4378419908
- DOI
- 10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book
- Source-reported types
- book
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- PE
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- Document · http://dx.doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4378419908
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- CÓMO CREAR DERECHOS SÓLIDOS PARA LAS TRANSACCIONES SOBRE EL CARBONO FORESTAL: RETOS PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DEL PROGRAMA REDD+ EN EL PERÚ HOW TO CREATE SOLID RIGHTS FOR FOREST CARBON TRANSACTIONS: CHALLENGES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REDD+ PROGRAM IN PERU · CITES
- openalex:w2884734064 · CITES
- openalex:w36334707 · CITES
- openalex:w4312235401 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
P. Pena; Sarmiento Barletti J.P... Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework. 2023. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- P. Pena; Sarmiento Barletti J.P... (2023). Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
- Chicago
- P. Pena; Sarmiento Barletti J.P... Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework. 2023. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
- ISO 690
- P. Pena; Sarmiento Barletti J.P... Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework. 2023. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Subnational governments and jurisdictional approaches to REDD+ in Peru: An analysis of the current legal and policy framework. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-fdfe4ecbbcde333f90d723907a5c6ab3/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version d635fb5eb804af48 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
3ff9559454e86e3b · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
4e7bc7fab0203382 · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
bac7b086ece2d536 · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
d635fb5eb804af48 · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.308970+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
PE ·
Source roles
Discovery source · http://dx.doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008876
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4378419908
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.