UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Desenvolvimento sustentável em debate: Uma análise das perspectivas de Ailton Krenak e Alberto Acosta

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.33448/rsd-v15i8.51603

Auteurs

Marcos Antunes Kopstein · Bruno Bataglin Avila · Fábio Dorado Dias · Robson Silveira Nogueira

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:13:55.660152+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:13:55.660152+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universidade Franciscana · Universidade da Região da Campanha

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The concept of sustainable development has become one of the main responses to increasing environmental degradation and inequalities resulting from the modern development model. However, its effectiveness has been questioned in view of the persistence of economic practices that maintain the exploitation of natural resources and the reproduction of social inequalities. In this context, this article aims to analyze the concept of sustainable development from the perspectives of Ailton Krenak and Alberto Acosta, identifying their main criticisms of the development paradigm and their contributions to the construction of alternative forms of relationship between society and nature. The research is characterized as qualitative and is based on a bibliographic review, analysis of documents, scientific articles, and literature related to the subject. The results indicate that Krenak and Acosta converge in their criticism of a development model centered on economic growth, advocating perspectives based on the interdependence between human beings and nature, the appreciation of traditional knowledge, and the overcoming of the logic of natural resource exploitation. It is concluded that their reflections broaden the debate on sustainability by proposing a change in the understanding of the relationships between development, society, and nature, presenting Buen Vivir as an alternative to the predominant development model.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7204003295

DOI

10.33448/rsd-v15i8.51603

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i8.51603
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7204003295

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w7115726646 · CITES
• openalex:w7169019062 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.