UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Desenvolvimento sustentável em debate: Uma análise das perspectivas de Ailton Krenak e Alberto Acosta

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.33448/rsd-v15i8.51603

Authors

Marcos Antunes Kopstein · Bruno Bataglin Avila · Fábio Dorado Dias · Robson Silveira Nogueira

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:13:55.660152+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:13:55.660152+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Universidade Franciscana · Universidade da Região da Campanha

Documentary abstract — original language

The concept of sustainable development has become one of the main responses to increasing environmental degradation and inequalities resulting from the modern development model. However, its effectiveness has been questioned in view of the persistence of economic practices that maintain the exploitation of natural resources and the reproduction of social inequalities. In this context, this article aims to analyze the concept of sustainable development from the perspectives of Ailton Krenak and Alberto Acosta, identifying their main criticisms of the development paradigm and their contributions to the construction of alternative forms of relationship between society and nature. The research is characterized as qualitative and is based on a bibliographic review, analysis of documents, scientific articles, and literature related to the subject. The results indicate that Krenak and Acosta converge in their criticism of a development model centered on economic growth, advocating perspectives based on the interdependence between human beings and nature, the appreciation of traditional knowledge, and the overcoming of the logic of natural resource exploitation. It is concluded that their reflections broaden the debate on sustainability by proposing a change in the understanding of the relationships between development, society, and nature, presenting Buen Vivir as an alternative to the predominant development model.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7204003295

DOI

10.33448/rsd-v15i8.51603

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i8.51603
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7204003295

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w7115726646 · CITES
• openalex:w7169019062 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.