Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field
Identification
- Clé publique
- doi:10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
- Auteurs
- Sujit Kuiry · Tapas Singh Sardar · Laxmiram Gope
- Année déclarée
- 2026
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- article
- Première détection
- 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Institutions déclarées par la source
Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University · Visva-Bharati University
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
: The word indigenous comes from the roots ‘Indigena, meaning within or inborn, associated with the particular land or situation. This knowledge varies from place to place, situation to situation and community to community. Generally, this knowledge is inherent in the indigenous tribe's practices, including family management, land rights, natural resource management, childcare, health, well-being and other aspects of daily life. . In tribal communities, practices are deeply intertwined with well-being and perceptions of it are subjective. Subjective well-being is a concept firmly rooted in individual experience within tribal communities; their ways of living promote it, whereas the Eurocentric worldview emphasizes objective well-being based on a uniform pattern of life and a narrower perspective, in contrast to tribal communities' subjective well-being. From this perspective, the researcher believes that indigenous knowledge systems comprise collective knowledge, abilities and customs that Indigenous people have created and transmitted over the centuries, collectively referred to as Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS). The culture, customs, and experiences of Indigenous peoples form the foundation of these systems, which are often intertwined with their spiritual beliefs and connections to the environment. Indigenous knowledge is the traditional wisdom, customs, and understanding cultivated over many generations by Indigenous communities, rooted in their environmental, spiritual, and cultural experiences. It encompasses a broad spectrum of knowledge, including governance, medicine, agriculture, storytelling, and craftsmanship. The above information is closely associated with the local ecosystems and way of life, and it is frequently passed down orally through various customs, practices, and observations. In this context, Indigenous knowledge is distinct, situation-specific and often intended to maintain the balance between nature and humans. From the above standpoint, subjective well-being is a form of social practice, and through these practices, indigenous communities mould the younger generation in line with their customs, culture, and social norms. From the Santhal worldview, Baha is not just a festival; it’s the celebration of newness and the customs and culture of the Santhal community, and through these practices, they cultivate subjective well-being. Fostering the development and well-being of a person or group in a thorough and balanced way, addressing multiple interrelated areas rather than focusing on just one, is known as holistic development. To ensure overall harmony and progress, it considers physical, emotional, mental, social, spiritual, and even environmental factors. The term well-being describes a general state of contentment, comfort and health . It encompasses mental, emotional, social and even spiritual aspects in addition to physical health. Finding harmony and balance in various facets of life is the key to achieving well-being.
Identifiants
- OPENALEX
- W7152500210
- DOI
- 10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- Doctrine
- Types déclarés par les sources
- article
- Entités naturelles mentionnées
- Écosystème
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2
Provenance des champs documentaires
Les valeurs étayées et les valeurs de provenance non résolue sont séparées. Une provenance bibliographique ne valide aucune affirmation juridique.
- Titre
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Publication
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Auteurs
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Type documentaire
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Juridiction
- Non renseigné
- Cour
- Non renseigné
- Autorité émettrice
- Non renseigné
- Éditeur
- Non renseigné
- DOI
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- ISBN
- Non renseigné
- Identifiant officiel
- Non renseigné
- URL source
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Statut déclaré par la source
- Non renseigné
- Modification / abrogation
- Non renseigné
Citer cette référence
Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. (2026). Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
- Chicago
- Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
- ISO 690
- Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-42a47fa9c2c68f86e704e04495e226ea/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Provenance par champ et version de la notice
Version 5f1f987c916faa72 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Titre
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
- Auteurs
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
- Année
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
- Identifiants
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
- URL source
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
L’historique porte sur les métadonnées de la notice, sans certifier l’état du droit.
04caa7ab9f9a332f · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
832d022d8fce7665 · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
89a0b9bd9413b509 · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
5f1f987c916faa72 · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
Rôles des sources
Source de découverte · https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
Source de découverte · https://openalex.org/W7152500210
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.