UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
Authors
Sujit Kuiry · Tapas Singh Sardar · Laxmiram Gope
Reported year
2026
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University · Visva-Bharati University

Documentary abstract — original language

: The word indigenous comes from the roots ‘Indigena, meaning within or inborn, associated with the particular land or situation. This knowledge varies from place to place, situation to situation and community to community. Generally, this knowledge is inherent in the indigenous tribe's practices, including family management, land rights, natural resource management, childcare, health, well-being and other aspects of daily life. . In tribal communities, practices are deeply intertwined with well-being and perceptions of it are subjective. Subjective well-being is a concept firmly rooted in individual experience within tribal communities; their ways of living promote it, whereas the Eurocentric worldview emphasizes objective well-being based on a uniform pattern of life and a narrower perspective, in contrast to tribal communities' subjective well-being. From this perspective, the researcher believes that indigenous knowledge systems comprise collective knowledge, abilities and customs that Indigenous people have created and transmitted over the centuries, collectively referred to as Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS). The culture, customs, and experiences of Indigenous peoples form the foundation of these systems, which are often intertwined with their spiritual beliefs and connections to the environment. Indigenous knowledge is the traditional wisdom, customs, and understanding cultivated over many generations by Indigenous communities, rooted in their environmental, spiritual, and cultural experiences. It encompasses a broad spectrum of knowledge, including governance, medicine, agriculture, storytelling, and craftsmanship. The above information is closely associated with the local ecosystems and way of life, and it is frequently passed down orally through various customs, practices, and observations. In this context, Indigenous knowledge is distinct, situation-specific and often intended to maintain the balance between nature and humans. From the above standpoint, subjective well-being is a form of social practice, and through these practices, indigenous communities mould the younger generation in line with their customs, culture, and social norms. From the Santhal worldview, Baha is not just a festival; it’s the celebration of newness and the customs and culture of the Santhal community, and through these practices, they cultivate subjective well-being. Fostering the development and well-being of a person or group in a thorough and balanced way, addressing multiple interrelated areas rather than focusing on just one, is known as holistic development. To ensure overall harmony and progress, it considers physical, emotional, mental, social, spiritual, and even environmental factors. The term well-being describes a general state of contentment, comfort and health . It encompasses mental, emotional, social and even spiritual aspects in addition to physical health. Finding harmony and balance in various facets of life is the key to achieving well-being.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W7152500210
DOI
10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Natural entities mentioned
Ecosystem

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. (2026). Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
Chicago
Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1
ISO 690
Sujit Kuiry; Tapas Singh Sardar; Laxmiram Gope. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Subjective Well-Being and Indigenous Communities: An Insight from the Field. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-42a47fa9c2c68f86e704e04495e226ea/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 5f1f987c916faa72 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

04caa7ab9f9a332f · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00

832d022d8fce7665 · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00

89a0b9bd9413b509 · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00

5f1f987c916faa72 · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.297368+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University

Visva-Bharati University

Laxmiram Gope

Sujit Kuiry

Tapas Singh Sardar

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.12691/wjssh-12-1-1

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7152500210

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library