UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Of rivers, law and justice in the Anthropocene

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1111/geoj.12442

Auteurs

John Page · Alessandro Pelizzon

Année déclarée

2022

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.851554+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:06:53.188696+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Southern Cross University · University of Canterbury

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

AU · NZ

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract Beginning in the 2010s, rivers have captured the legal imagination of judges, legislators and activists alike, as part of a rapidly growing phenomenon described by UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, David Boyd as ‘a legal revolution that could save the world’. Investigating river cases in jurisdictions as diverse as Aotearoa New Zealand, Colombia, India, the United States and Australia, and following Nicole Graham's suggestion that the non‐human world is constantly reconstituted within an all‐encompassing legal cosmology for which any observable ‘thing’, any ‘object’, any landscape, is always, inherently, and inevitably a ‘lawscape’, this paper explores the legal and the ontological nature of ‘the river’. By casting traditional riparian doctrines against novel rights of Nature judgments, the paper highlights the interconnected and interdependent legal relationship between artificially construed human and non‐human worlds, and observes a series of perceptible generational shifts in the legal and ontological treatment of rivers, from an abstract near‐neglect, to a rights‐based discourse, and ending (for the moment at least) in a deeply relational re‐conceptualisation.

Identifiants

DOI

10.1111/geoj.12442

OPENALEX

W4229024620

OPENAIRE

doi_________::80ba9ffc2d16f712ca2291fa3852d76a

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

Article · article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

AU · CO · IN · NZ · US

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Fleuve / rivière · Paysage

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12442
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4229024620

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w128107805 · CITES
• Property as the Keystone Right · CITES
• openalex:w1499980340 · CITES
• Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
• openalex:w1529325023 · CITES
• openalex:w1542993026 · CITES
• Mapping the Terrain of Earth Jurisprudence: Landscape, Thresholds and Horizons · CITES
• openalex:w1603654413 · CITES
• Earth laws, rights of nature and legal pluralism · CITES
• Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide · CITES
• Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail · CITES
• At the Intersection of the Sacred and the Legal: Rights for Nature in Uttarakhand, India · CITES
• openalex:w2767200912 · CITES
• openalex:w2793165177 · CITES
• openalex:w2795396806 · CITES
• Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects · CITES
• openalex:w2884005466 · CITES
• openalex:w2944501570 · CITES
• Can You Hear the Rivers Sing? Legal Personhood, Ontology, and the Nitty-Gritty of Governance · CITES
• Environmental Personhood and Standing for Nature: Examining the Colorado River case · CITES

20 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.