UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Green Tourism and Spatial Planning Conflict: A Comparative Study of Ecotourism Regulations in Indonesia and New Zealand

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.59890/ijels.v4i4.320

Auteurs

Indri Septiana · Sunarno · M. Endriyo Susila

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:17:55.259231+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:17:55.259231+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The land conversion in the Sentul–Puncak area for tourism development by a regional state- owned enterprise (BUMD) illustrates a systemic failure in Indonesia's spatial and environmental governance. Fragmented regulations across spatial planning, environmental protection, and tourism law have weakened monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, making them vulnerable to political and short- term investment interests. This article aims to analyze the legal conflict in spatial planning within tourism development and propose an integrative regulatory model based on green zoning grounded in ecological sustainability. Using a normative legal approach with qualitative methods, this study applies four approaches: statutory, conceptual, case-based, and comparative. The Indonesian legal system is compared with New Zealand’s effective eco-tourism framework, as reflected in the Resource Management Act 1991, Conservation Act 1987, the application of ecological carrying capacity, and mandatory sustainability certification through Qualmark. The study finds that Indonesia urgently requires regulatory reform, including the implementation of ecological zoning, mandatory sustainability certification for tourism businesses, and substantive community participation in land-use oversight. The legal novelty proposed in this study lies in the integration of spatial, environmental, and tourism law through a unified permit system and the establishment of community-based oversight forums. This model is expected to prevent spatial conflicts and strengthen the foundation of green tourism that responds to both ecological challenges and spatial justice in Indonesia.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7161624349

DOI

10.59890/ijels.v4i4.320

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

ID · NZ

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v4i4.320
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7161624349

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1518025024 · CITES
• Sustainable management, a sustainable ethic? · CITES
• openalex:w1989763974 · CITES
• openalex:w2030504032 · CITES
• openalex:w2061935394 · CITES
• openalex:w2073444783 · CITES
• openalex:w2120835013 · CITES
• openalex:w2171575424 · CITES
• openalex:w2297772082 · CITES
• openalex:w2305288095 · CITES
• openalex:w2464422675 · CITES
• openalex:w2479875217 · CITES
• openalex:w2508278584 · CITES
• openalex:w2528454711 · CITES
• openalex:w2580171699 · CITES
• openalex:w2623703952 · CITES
• openalex:w2897386646 · CITES
• openalex:w2945311740 · CITES
• openalex:w2946546307 · CITES
• openalex:w3077445660 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Publication académique détectée

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.