UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-1e5d77c03d464f3ad42daa51cf2e545e

Auteurs

Dunn‑Capper, Rowan · Quintero‑Uribe, Laura C. · Pereira, Henrique M. · Sandom, Christopher J.

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

und

Type source

Text

Première détection

2026-11-13T08:38:58.195547+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T08:38:58.195547+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Conservation and restoration projects often fail to engage local communities during the planning and implementation stage. In addition, when considering urban boundary ecosystems, there exists a wide range of stakeholders that must be involved in the planning process to ensure social equity in land management outcomes. Traditional methods for assessing future landscape change scenarios have been critiqued for their inability to adequately incorporate the diverse range of stakeholder values. This paper presents a multicriteria mapping study, incorporating a novel application of the Nature Futures Framework, to assess nature recovery scenarios on Brighton and Hove’s Downland Estate—an urban boundary landscape surrounding the city of Brighton and Hove in Sussex, South East England. We focus on two key research outcomes. First, we assess the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery options across Nature Future value perspectives and between contrasting stakeholder groups. Second, by mapping stakeholder values from our multicriteria mapping study, we demonstrate that the Nature Futures Framework provides a robust framework within which to assess the diverse values stakeholders hold for land use change. We propose that utilizing the Nature Futures Framework, in combination with the multicriteria mapping interview technique, can form a valuable tool to elicit stakeholder values that may have been hidden, or underrepresented in traditional assessment methods, and to compare the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery scenarios between stakeholder groups.

Identifiants

DOI

10.25673/126230

PPN

1853234052

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

unknown

Types déclarés par les sources

Text

Éditeurs

Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

DataCite · Document 1

• Document · https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/128168

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.