UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Diverse approaches to nature recovery are needed to meet the varied needs of people and nature

Identification

Public canonical key

radar:r-1e5d77c03d464f3ad42daa51cf2e545e

Authors

Dunn‑Capper, Rowan · Quintero‑Uribe, Laura C. · Pereira, Henrique M. · Sandom, Christopher J.

Reported year

2026

Reported language

und

Source type

Text

First detected

2026-11-13T08:38:58.195547+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-13T08:38:58.195547+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Conservation and restoration projects often fail to engage local communities during the planning and implementation stage. In addition, when considering urban boundary ecosystems, there exists a wide range of stakeholders that must be involved in the planning process to ensure social equity in land management outcomes. Traditional methods for assessing future landscape change scenarios have been critiqued for their inability to adequately incorporate the diverse range of stakeholder values. This paper presents a multicriteria mapping study, incorporating a novel application of the Nature Futures Framework, to assess nature recovery scenarios on Brighton and Hove’s Downland Estate—an urban boundary landscape surrounding the city of Brighton and Hove in Sussex, South East England. We focus on two key research outcomes. First, we assess the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery options across Nature Future value perspectives and between contrasting stakeholder groups. Second, by mapping stakeholder values from our multicriteria mapping study, we demonstrate that the Nature Futures Framework provides a robust framework within which to assess the diverse values stakeholders hold for land use change. We propose that utilizing the Nature Futures Framework, in combination with the multicriteria mapping interview technique, can form a valuable tool to elicit stakeholder values that may have been hidden, or underrepresented in traditional assessment methods, and to compare the perceived performance of alternative nature recovery scenarios between stakeholder groups.

Identifiers

DOI

10.25673/126230

PPN

1853234052

Documentary context

Documentary family

unknown

Source-reported types

Text

Publishers

Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

DataCite · Record 1

• Document · https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/128168

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.