UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Legal implications of the climate-health crisis: A case study analysis of the role of public health in climate litigation

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268633

Auteurs

Narayan Toolan · Hannah Marcus · Elizabeth G. Hanna · Chadia Wannous

Année déclarée

2022

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

review

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:16:01.593414+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:19:10.134445+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Australian National University · Future Earth · University of Alberta · University of California, Los Angeles · World Federation of Public Health Associations

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

BACKGROUND: Strong scientific evidence affirms that climate change is now a public health emergency. Increasingly, climate litigation brought against governments and corporations utilizes international human rights, environmental and climate laws and policies to seek accountability for climate-destructive and health-harming actions. The health impacts of climate change make litigation an important means of pursuing justice and strategically challenging legal systems. Yet there is scant documentation in the literature of the role that public health has played in climate litigation and the legal weight public health narratives are given in such contexts. Therefore, we assessed to what extent courts of law have used public health harm in legal adjudication and sought to provide practical recommendations to address barriers to positioning legal arguments in public health-centric frames. METHODS: We reviewed legal databases to identify all publicly reported, documented, cases of climate litigation filed in any country or jurisdiction between 1990 and September 2020. For the 1641 cases identified, we quantified the frequency of cases where health concerns were explicitly or implicitly raised. FINDINGS: Case numbers are trending upwards, notably in high income countries. Resolution remains pending in over half of cases as the majority were initiated in the past three years. Cases were primarily based in climate and human rights law and brought by a wide range of groups and individuals predominantly against governments. About half of the decided cases found in favour for the plaintiffs. Based on this, we selected the 65 cases that were directly linked to public health. We found economic forces and pricing of health risks play a key role, as courts are challenged by litigants to adjudicate on the responsibility for health impacts. CONCLUSIONS: While courts of law are receptive to public health science, significant legal reform is needed to enhance leveraging of public health evidence in legal judgements of climate litigation cases. The integration of a public health mandate into a new eco-centric legal paradigm will optimize its potential to promote human well-being-the core objective underpinning both international law, human rights, and public health. Existing legal doctrines and practices can be enhanced to increase the weight of public health arguments in climate legal action and consequently ensure legal rulings in climate litigation prioritize, protect and promote public health.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4282919781

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0268633

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

review

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268633
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4282919781

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w102563370 · CITES
• openalex:w1254414159 · CITES
• openalex:w169370418 · CITES
• openalex:w2032899432 · CITES
• openalex:w2043437327 · CITES
• openalex:w2112621181 · CITES
• openalex:w2130572584 · CITES
• openalex:w2150930940 · CITES
• openalex:w2155059371 · CITES
• Making Wild Law Work—The Role of ‘Connection with Nature’ and Education in Developing an Ecocentric Property Law · CITES
• openalex:w2486618895 · CITES
• openalex:w2499915282 · CITES
• openalex:w2561654031 · CITES
• openalex:w2574109959 · CITES
• openalex:w2586442399 · CITES
• openalex:w2626726142 · CITES
• openalex:w2725277231 · CITES
• openalex:w2763447226 · CITES
• openalex:w2765153103 · CITES
• openalex:w2768199755 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.