Análisis de la Sentencia N°22-18-IN/21: evaluación de la efectividad de decisiones judiciales ambientales.
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
- Authors
- Nayelis Alejandra Villarreal-Prado · Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita · Jessica Johanna Santander Moreno
- Reported year
- 2023
- Reported language
- es
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.907718+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes
Reported affiliation countries
EC
Documentary abstract — original language
Este análisis jurídico se centra en los derechos de la naturaleza en Ecuador y la tensión entre el desarrollo económico y la protección ambiental. El estudio examinó las contradicciones en las normativas ambientales, especialmente en el caso No. 22-18-IN/21, y abogó por una perspectiva ecológica holística en el sistema legal. Se empleó una metodología que combina enfoques cualitativos y cuantitativos, analizando detalladamente la sentencia N°22-18-IN/21 y otros documentos judiciales relevantes; se utilizaron encuestas semiestructuradas para evaluar el impacto de la sentencia en términos de protección ambiental, destacando la necesidad de un enfoque legal más integral y la importancia de equilibrar el desarrollo económico con la protección del medio ambiente en Ecuador.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4389227353
- DOI
- 10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::c04b89ee50ca104e7377d1d78420bd57
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- Document · http://dx.doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4389227353
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Nayelis Alejandra Villarreal-Prado; Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita; Jessica Johanna Santander Moreno. Análisis de la Sentencia N°22-18-IN/21: evaluación de la efectividad de decisiones judiciales ambientales.. 2023. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Nayelis Alejandra Villarreal-Prado; Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita; Jessica Johanna Santander Moreno. (2023). Análisis de la Sentencia N°22-18-IN/21: evaluación de la efectividad de decisiones judiciales ambientales.. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
- Chicago
- Nayelis Alejandra Villarreal-Prado; Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita; Jessica Johanna Santander Moreno. Análisis de la Sentencia N°22-18-IN/21: evaluación de la efectividad de decisiones judiciales ambientales.. 2023. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
- ISO 690
- Nayelis Alejandra Villarreal-Prado; Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita; Jessica Johanna Santander Moreno. Análisis de la Sentencia N°22-18-IN/21: evaluación de la efectividad de decisiones judiciales ambientales.. 2023. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Análisis de la Sentencia N°22-18-IN/21: evaluación de la efectividad de decisiones judiciales ambientales.. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-fe87e6b2f5614cc26dac7f92fbf28b44/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version a3be63af4ad8164a · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:33.711559+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:33.711559+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:33.711559+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:33.711559+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:33.711559+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
61cdfb3d7fd88d7b · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
a79f426116b4f8c7 · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
6e9f16b92e4c6d22 · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
a3be63af4ad8164a · 2026-11-09T19:13:09.528106+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes
Jessica Johanna Santander Moreno
Nayelis Alejandra Villarreal-Prado
Source roles
Discovery source · http://dx.doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v11iespecial.3943
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4389227353
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.