The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
- Authors
- Mihnea Tănăsescu
- Reported year
- 2013
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.855876+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Reported affiliation countries
BE
Documentary abstract — original language
In 2008, Ecuador became the first country in history to guarantee rights to nature, in its new constitution. This article tells the story of this extraordinary moment in constitutional history, presenting a detailed description of how these rights came about, why they appeared when and where they did, and what they mean to those concerned with this innovation.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
- OPENALEX
- W2019076588
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::4bdc2c6069e916394d24eb171322a1f5
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
- THE ECUADORIAN EXEMPLAR: THE FIRST EVER VINDICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF NATURE · CITES
- openalex:w1991098428 · CITES
- openalex:w2010264299 · CITES
- openalex:w2184209933 · CITES
- openalex:w2978482664 · CITES
- Should Trees have Standing?— Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
- openalex:w3176935557 · CITES
- Should Trees Have Standing?: Law, Morality, and the Environment · CITES
- openalex:w4250371488 · CITES
- openalex:w4300788347 · CITES
- openalex:w564907848 · CITES
- openalex:w629539893 · CITES
68 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Mihnea Tănăsescu. The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Mihnea Tănăsescu. (2013). The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
- Chicago
- Mihnea Tănăsescu. The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
- ISO 690
- Mihnea Tănăsescu. The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e97cdc6e99e8f0a2784dc4b849e6a576/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version d0072a7e26de43ab · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
25fb207f636c5059 · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
9130ce134c5db4d2 · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
cef631b670a17462 · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.286026+00:00
47ac9d0d38ab19ab · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00
d0072a7e26de43ab · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.091953+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.845715
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2019076588
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.