UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.14288/1.0071699
Authors
Reem Hajjar
Reported year
2011
Reported language
en
Source type
dissertation
First detected
2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Community forestry can deliver economic, socio-cultural and ecological benefits to local communities. Case studies from around the world have shown this, yet results have also been mixed, as many initiatives have failed to deliver their promises. Criticisms have arisen that community forestry remains dominated by decision-making by offsite experts, replication of models deemed successful in other contexts, and the spread of forestry practices that have been developed for the large-scale forest industry. This research provides further insights into community forestry from the perspective of the local forest user. A case study approach was used for an in-depth examination of six community forestry initiatives in Brazil and Mexico, assessing the current status of community forestry and suggesting a path forward based on local needs and wants. Qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews with community members, and elements of grounded theory methodology, were used to: assess the amount of forest management authority communities currently have; create a framework outlining the challenges facing communities in managing their forests; and, identify community-defined goals and processes for community forestry initiatives. Results showed that, despite the rhetoric of decentralization, communities continue to work within tightly regulated frameworks of forest management with limited decision-making power for forest product commercialization. Within this limited power structure, communities face interrelated challenges in both the development and operationalization phases of forestry initiatives, requiring a holistic strategy of intervention to encourage the maintenance of a profitable and self-sufficient enterprise. In identifying community-defined goals, this research found that other livelihood strategies, particularly agricultural practices, need to be considered when designing forestry interventions that are overly focused on timber production. This exercise also underlined the need to promote site-specific models of intervention that take into account the variety of contexts and community interests. A better understanding of local perspectives can aid in the design of community forestry interventions brought by conservation and development agencies, by adding an important and understudied perspective to the problems that face community forestry. Without the community member playing an essential and empowered role, the success of community forestry will be limited.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W2342268573
DOI
10.14288/1.0071699

Documentary context

Documentary family
Thesis
Source-reported types
dissertation
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
BR · MX
Natural entities mentioned
Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

2 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Reem Hajjar. Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico. 2011. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0071699

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Reem Hajjar. (2011). Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0071699
Chicago
Reem Hajjar. Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico. 2011. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0071699
ISO 690
Reem Hajjar. Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico. 2011. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0071699

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e88281a39a2996f2f6ed3cae350c768a/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version f4d633f2da649acb · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

a5c2c0426ede22f1 · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00

834a7c04f872898a · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00

f464e764b1cd8ed9 · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00

f4d633f2da649acb · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.313129+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

BR · MX ·

Reem Hajjar

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0071699

Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/2429/33646

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2342268573

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library