UDTR Legal Library

UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.3390/ijerph19106183
Authors
Shuning Zhu · Jinlong Liu · Hao Xu · Lingchao Li · Wentao Yang
Reported year
2022
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Beijing Forestry University · Renmin University of China

Documentary abstract — original language

The new wave of reform of collective forestland tenure (NRCFT) in China is considered an important policy for achieving sustainable management of forest resources. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of NRCFT on forest fragmentation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China based on a fixed-effects model. The forest fragmentation was analyzed based on the remote sensing images of Landsat and landscape pattern indices in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2000 to 2018. The results showed that (1) The NRCFT has significantly contributed to reducing forest fragmentation. (2) The effect of economic growth on forest fragmentation showed an inverted U-shape. (3) The implementation of the Grain for Green Program (GGP) and the transformation of rural energy consumption significantly reduce the degree of forest fragmentation. This study has crucial implications for formulating policies, achieving good forest governance, and reducing forest fragmentation.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W4280582359
DOI
10.3390/ijerph19106183

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
CN
Natural entities mentioned
Forest · Landscape

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1176271006 · CITES
  • openalex:w1493232756 · CITES
  • openalex:w1512557450 · CITES
  • openalex:w182641002 · CITES
  • openalex:w1980138712 · CITES
  • openalex:w1986821457 · CITES
  • openalex:w1992952424 · CITES
  • openalex:w2013232829 · CITES
  • openalex:w2018773489 · CITES
  • openalex:w2029632779 · CITES
  • openalex:w2029676264 · CITES
  • openalex:w2032890930 · CITES
  • openalex:w2035829295 · CITES
  • openalex:w2040138348 · CITES
  • openalex:w2040368754 · CITES
  • Decentralisation and democratic forest reforms in India: Moving to a rights-based approach · CITES
  • openalex:w2058585580 · CITES
  • openalex:w2073321019 · CITES
  • openalex:w2080578930 · CITES
  • openalex:w2089953145 · CITES

2 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Shuning Zhu; Jinlong Liu; Hao Xu; Lingchao Li; Wentao Yang. Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106183

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Shuning Zhu; Jinlong Liu; Hao Xu; Lingchao Li; Wentao Yang. (2022). Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106183
Chicago
Shuning Zhu; Jinlong Liu; Hao Xu; Lingchao Li; Wentao Yang. Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106183
ISO 690
Shuning Zhu; Jinlong Liu; Hao Xu; Lingchao Li; Wentao Yang. Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106183

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e8656a658e81ad413f3d67c25f85ec2e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version d2c1bc7c1b0059c8 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

9d573d4ce2321602 · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00

87191207fc28e7fe · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00

5d0aafc77ac8e019 · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00

d2c1bc7c1b0059c8 · 2026-11-09T19:20:00.312909+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

CN ·

Beijing Forestry University

Renmin University of China

Hao Xu

Jinlong Liu

Lingchao Li

Shuning Zhu

Wentao Yang

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106183

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4280582359

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library