RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.5282/rcc/8164
- Authors
- —
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en · eng
- Source type
- Other literature type
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
In 2008, Ecuador became the first country to acknowledge Nature as a rights holder within its constitution. In a world where Nature is primarily treated as a resource, the Rights of Nature concept and its emerging application prompts important questions: What are the theoretical, logistical, and cultural challenges of granting Nature rights? Who can represent and defend nature and why? Is the concept a necessary progression towards an environmental future? By presenting legal theory, politics, and case studies, the authors of this volume open up an accessible and multidisciplinary dialogue to explore the fundamental question: Can Nature have rights?
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W6950435814
- DOI
- 10.5282/rcc/8164
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::d0ecb0087001bdf20fb2ab961e4d8a4f
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Other
- Source-reported types
- Other literature type · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
- Document · https://dx.doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W6950435814
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- (2026). RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
- Chicago
- RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
- ISO 690
- RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e72343b73dd2dc691caab8e7e089f46f/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 34bd2329882311eb · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
- Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
8df7863193123efe · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
2dddc1c012e7ba43 · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
fd96169175e24f00 · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
34bd2329882311eb · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
Discovery source · https://dx.doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W6950435814
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.