UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.5282/rcc/8164
Authors
—
Reported year
2026
Reported language
en · eng
Source type
Other literature type
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

In 2008, Ecuador became the first country to acknowledge Nature as a rights holder within its constitution. In a world where Nature is primarily treated as a resource, the Rights of Nature concept and its emerging application prompts important questions: What are the theoretical, logistical, and cultural challenges of granting Nature rights? Who can represent and defend nature and why? Is the concept a necessary progression towards an environmental future? By presenting legal theory, politics, and case studies, the authors of this volume open up an accessible and multidisciplinary dialogue to explore the fundamental question: Can Nature have rights?

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W6950435814
DOI
10.5282/rcc/8164
OPENAIRE
doi_________::d0ecb0087001bdf20fb2ab961e4d8a4f

Documentary context

Documentary family
Other
Source-reported types
Other literature type · article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

    2 incoming references within the detected corpus

    Documentary field provenance

    Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

    Title
    Documentary source reported
    Publication
    Documentary source reported
    Authors
    Not recorded
    Document type
    Documentary source reported
    Jurisdiction
    Not recorded
    Court
    Not recorded
    Issuing authority
    Not recorded
    Publisher
    Not recorded
    DOI
    Documentary source reported
    ISBN
    Not recorded
    Official identifier
    Not recorded
    Source URL
    Documentary source reported
    Source-reported status
    Not recorded
    Amendment / repeal
    Not recorded

    Cite this reference

    RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164

    JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

    APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

    APA
    (2026). RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
    Chicago
    RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164
    ISO 690
    RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164

    UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. RCC Perspectives, Vol. 6 (2017): Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e72343b73dd2dc691caab8e7e089f46f/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

    Report a correction

    Field provenance and record version

    Version 34bd2329882311eb · udtr-reference-1.1.2

    Title
    OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
    Authors
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
    Year
    OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
    Identifiers
    OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
    Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
    Source URL
    OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.638939+00:00
    Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.

    History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

    8df7863193123efe · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00

    2dddc1c012e7ba43 · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00

    fd96169175e24f00 · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00

    34bd2329882311eb · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.923470+00:00

    Frozen-version metadata

    Research dossiers and documentary relations

    Source roles

    Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164

    Discovery source · https://dx.doi.org/10.5282/rcc/8164

    Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W6950435814

    An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

    Documentary status

    Relevance pending

    Library

    This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

    UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library