Strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities: a comparative socio-legal study of Thailand and Ireland
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.13025/17274
- Authors
- Somanand, Theerada
- Reported year
- 2019
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- dissertation
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
This research aims to find out how to strengthen access to civil justice for persons with disabilities, especially in Thailand and Ireland. It examines the meaning of “access to justice” through theories of justice and access to justice, principles of equality, general international human rights law and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). The research identifies four dimensions of the conception of justice in the disability context: institutional, capability, non-domination and equality dimensions; and adopts Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach by interpreting the conception of access to justice in this study as a “functioning” that persons with disabilities have reason to value in order to be able to achieve their rights and liberties protected by the rule of law. The research also examines international human rights laws, and classifies the right to access to civil justice into six categories: 1) the right to equality before courts and tribunals, 2) the right to legal assistance or representation, 3) the right to communication assistance, 4) the right to be heard or a fair hearing by courts, tribunals or other competent bodies in personal presence within a reasonable time or without delay, 5) the right to a remedy, reparation or compensation, and 6) the right to complain, challenge or appeal. The research findings show that the phrase “effective access to justice for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others” in article 13 of the UNCRPD and interrelationship between article 13 and other articles in the Convention are the key additional features provided by the UNCRPD. The research examines legal mechanisms and regulations on access to civil justice for persons with disabilities in two jurisdictions: Thailand and Ireland, and includes qualitative research with all groups of persons with disabilities and people who work in the justice system to identify the effectiveness of these laws and regulations in practice. This research proposes five key elements for strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities in those two countries: 1) effective and enforceable legal mechanisms, 2) competent, independent and impartial justice systems, 3) supportive mechanisms, 4) positive and inclusive attitudes towards persons with disabilities, and 5) effective enforcement mechanisms.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2913284008
- DOI
- 10.13025/17274
- HANDLE
- 10379/14976
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Thesis
- Source-reported types
- dissertation
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IE · TH
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.13025/17274
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10379/14976
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2913284008
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Somanand, Theerada. Strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities: a comparative socio-legal study of Thailand and Ireland. 2019. https://doi.org/10.13025/17274
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Somanand, Theerada. (2019). Strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities: a comparative socio-legal study of Thailand and Ireland. https://doi.org/10.13025/17274
- Chicago
- Somanand, Theerada. Strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities: a comparative socio-legal study of Thailand and Ireland. 2019. https://doi.org/10.13025/17274
- ISO 690
- Somanand, Theerada. Strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities: a comparative socio-legal study of Thailand and Ireland. 2019. https://doi.org/10.13025/17274
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Strengthening access to civil justice for persons with disabilities: a comparative socio-legal study of Thailand and Ireland. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e63c152fe0e6d860e895073856596e11/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 78f8cddd2879a258 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
ea93937d85d0b75f · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
1e2d031f5a7ca168 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
b2746c310584cc23 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
78f8cddd2879a258 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.812617+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.13025/17274
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10379/14976
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2913284008
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.