UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f
Authors
Adrian Martin · Bereket Kebede · Nicole D. Gross‐Camp · Jun He · Mirna Inturias · Iokiñe Rodríguez
Reported year
2019
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Allegheny College · Nur University · University of East Anglia · Yunnan University

Documentary abstract — original language

Abstract This research is concerned with the trend towards commodification of forestry, in the context of community forest governance for sustainable development in the tropics. In these contexts, commodification takes different forms, including sales of certified timbers and sales of carbon credits. In addition to the general aim to enhance income, these market-based forestry interventions typically aim to align with sustainable development agendas, including (a) safeguarding ecological integrity and (b) promoting poverty alleviation. Our concern here is that the process of forest commodification might lead to a shift in local norms of benefit-sharing, in ways that can hinder these key components of sustainable development goals. We report the results of a survey (N = 519) conducted across sites in Bolivia, China and Tanzania that shows that switching from non-monetary to monetary benefits is associated with changes in preferences for distributional fairness in ways that may be detrimental to the poor. In particular, we show that forest commodification is associated with a lower likelihood of selecting pro-poor or egalitarian approaches to benefit sharing and higher likelihood of selecting to distribute benefits in a way that rewards individual contributions or compensates losses.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W2923492054
DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Natural entities mentioned
Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1014644433 · CITES
  • openalex:w1507288808 · CITES
  • openalex:w1515427165 · CITES
  • openalex:w1536605276 · CITES
  • openalex:w1589572802 · CITES
  • openalex:w1954045752 · CITES
  • openalex:w1965689506 · CITES
  • openalex:w1967988279 · CITES
  • openalex:w1969203828 · CITES
  • openalex:w1974266613 · CITES
  • openalex:w1998053404 · CITES
  • openalex:w2011848308 · CITES
  • openalex:w2013765137 · CITES
  • openalex:w2020361306 · CITES
  • openalex:w2025493496 · CITES
  • openalex:w2028411782 · CITES
  • openalex:w2035829646 · CITES
  • openalex:w2049657642 · CITES
  • openalex:w2062485867 · CITES
  • openalex:w2068135970 · CITES

2 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Adrian Martin; Bereket Kebede; Nicole D. Gross‐Camp; Jun He; Mirna Inturias; Iokiñe Rodríguez. Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Adrian Martin; Bereket Kebede; Nicole D. Gross‐Camp; Jun He; Mirna Inturias; Iokiñe Rodríguez. (2019). Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f
Chicago
Adrian Martin; Bereket Kebede; Nicole D. Gross‐Camp; Jun He; Mirna Inturias; Iokiñe Rodríguez. Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f
ISO 690
Adrian Martin; Bereket Kebede; Nicole D. Gross‐Camp; Jun He; Mirna Inturias; Iokiñe Rodríguez. Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-dc9bc6e22e52b0bcc691ac8b7c64672f/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 0dbf3c6a8aef53c6 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

109986802b631cce · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00

58f3b92899f17f52 · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00

b3ef4eb147ea26e9 · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00

0dbf3c6a8aef53c6 · 2026-11-09T19:17:15.947254+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Allegheny College

Nur University

University of East Anglia

Yunnan University

Adrian Martin

Bereket Kebede

Iokiñe Rodríguez

Jun He

Mirna Inturias

Nicole D. Gross‐Camp

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2923492054

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library