UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Protection of the Right to Marry Against Guardians' Refusal Based on Javanese Custom Taboos

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2297

Authors

Nur Azizah · Ahmad Syaifudin · Moh. Muhibbin

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.805780+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.805780+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Universitas Islam Malang

Reported affiliation countries

ID

Documentary abstract — original language

General Background: The right to marry is protected within Indonesian law, while Islamic marriage requires a guardian whose authority is not absolute when refusal lacks a legitimate religious basis. Specific Background: At the Blitar Religious Court, wali nasab refusal may arise from Javanese customary taboos involving weton or jilu, ngalor-ngulon, kebo balik kandang, the Brantas River boundary, and beliefs associated with parental death. Knowledge Gap: Prior studies have examined wali adhal, guardian authority, and customary marriage law, but empirical analysis combining customary refusal, protection of the prospective bride’s right to marry, and judicial reasoning remains limited. Aims: This empirical juridical study examines forms of refusal, legal protection through wali adhal and wali hakim, and judges’ ratio decidendi using statutory, case, sociological, interview, documentation, and literature approaches. Results: Refusals are mainly rooted in personal and psychological fears inherited through customary beliefs rather than recognized legal impediments. Wali adhal determination and wali hakim appointment provide a formal remedy, while judges assess whether stated reasons are valid under Islamic and Indonesian positive law; restrictive customs without such basis may fall within 'urf fasid. Novelty: The study connects Javanese customary beliefs, Islamic marriage law, the constitutional right to marry, and judicial reasoning in actual Blitar cases. Implications: Judicial review of customary grounds can preserve cultural consideration while securing legal certainty and access to lawful marriage Highlights: Weton or jilu, ngalor-ngulon, kebo balik kandang, Brantas River boundaries, and parental-death beliefs were identified as reasons for rejection. A court-appointed substitute may enable the union to proceed when family consent is withheld without a valid religious or statutory basis. Judges test asserted traditions against Islamic and positive law; unsupported restrictions may be classified as 'urf fasid. Keywords: Right to Marry, Wali Adhal, Wali Nasab, Javanese Customary Prohibitions, Legal Protection

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7220654308

DOI

10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2297

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Natural entities mentioned

River

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2297
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7220654308

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w2886109914 · CITES
• openalex:w3087978011 · CITES
• openalex:w3088703678 · CITES
• openalex:w4206484741 · CITES
• openalex:w4285472282 · CITES
• openalex:w4298003272 · CITES
• openalex:w4312310651 · CITES
• openalex:w4322776440 · CITES
• openalex:w4389309464 · CITES
• openalex:w4396559339 · CITES
• openalex:w4401498724 · CITES
• openalex:w4402695327 · CITES
• openalex:w4406299113 · CITES
• openalex:w4409878562 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.