UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
Authors
Louis Jacobus Kotze · Duncan A. French
Reported year
2018
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

North-West University · University of Lincoln

Documentary abstract — original language

In May 2018, the process which may ultimately lead to the negotiation of a legally binding Global Pact for the environment formally commenced under the auspices of the United Nations General Assembly. Expectations for the Pact are high, evidenced in particular by its multiple and overlapping objectives: to serve as a generic binding instrument of international environmental law (IEL) principles; to integrate, consolidate, unify and ultimately entrench many of the fragmented principles of IEL; and to constitute the first global environmental human rights instrument. In the wake of the impending intergovernmental process, the paper offers a thorough critique of the draft Pact in its present iteration. We do so with the aim of evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the present draft Pact by interrogating: (a) its diplomatic and symbolic relevance and possible unique contribution at the policy level to global environmental law and governance, and (b) its potential at the operational level of IEL and global environmental governance, focusing on the extent to which the draft Pact accommodates both existing and more recent rules and principles for environmental protection. As the Pact’s primary ambition is to become a universally binding global treaty, it would be churlish not to recognise its potential for innovation, as well as the considerable opportunity that the negotiation of the Pact will have to generate broad-sweeping and positive impacts. However, our central thesis is that only if the Global Pact were to incorporate ambitious normative provisions to strengthen those public and private global governance efforts that aim to halt the deterioration of Earth system integrity, as well as to maintain and improve integrity, will it be able to offer a firm foundation of the type of Anthropocene Law, termed here as the Lex Anthropocenae , required to confront head-on the deep socio-ecological crisis of the Anthropocene.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W2896315599
DOI
10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1004793495 · CITES
  • openalex:w104811708 · CITES
  • openalex:w1489672447 · CITES
  • openalex:w1967492775 · CITES
  • openalex:w1998380343 · CITES
  • openalex:w2019625409 · CITES
  • openalex:w2036479846 · CITES
  • openalex:w2043836348 · CITES
  • openalex:w2046672867 · CITES
  • openalex:w2103736591 · CITES
  • openalex:w2105414963 · CITES
  • openalex:w2106166864 · CITES
  • openalex:w2113534314 · CITES
  • openalex:w2121739590 · CITES
  • openalex:w2169218869 · CITES
  • openalex:w2230921575 · CITES
  • openalex:w2252624440 · CITES
  • openalex:w2263532705 · CITES
  • openalex:w2269476587 · CITES
  • openalex:w2287220709 · CITES

12 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. (2018). A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
Chicago
Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
ISO 690
Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d863715693f92b762b2d28fbb2c461a7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 4eb001aa116baade · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

8c3b8b92c164513d · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00

3f8d3acea6201e49 · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00

d957bac6d3c431d2 · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00

4eb001aa116baade · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

North-West University

University of Lincoln

Duncan A. French

Louis Jacobus Kotze

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2896315599

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library