A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
- Authors
- Louis Jacobus Kotze · Duncan A. French
- Reported year
- 2018
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
North-West University · University of Lincoln
Documentary abstract — original language
In May 2018, the process which may ultimately lead to the negotiation of a legally binding Global Pact for the environment formally commenced under the auspices of the United Nations General Assembly. Expectations for the Pact are high, evidenced in particular by its multiple and overlapping objectives: to serve as a generic binding instrument of international environmental law (IEL) principles; to integrate, consolidate, unify and ultimately entrench many of the fragmented principles of IEL; and to constitute the first global environmental human rights instrument. In the wake of the impending intergovernmental process, the paper offers a thorough critique of the draft Pact in its present iteration. We do so with the aim of evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the present draft Pact by interrogating: (a) its diplomatic and symbolic relevance and possible unique contribution at the policy level to global environmental law and governance, and (b) its potential at the operational level of IEL and global environmental governance, focusing on the extent to which the draft Pact accommodates both existing and more recent rules and principles for environmental protection. As the Pact’s primary ambition is to become a universally binding global treaty, it would be churlish not to recognise its potential for innovation, as well as the considerable opportunity that the negotiation of the Pact will have to generate broad-sweeping and positive impacts. However, our central thesis is that only if the Global Pact were to incorporate ambitious normative provisions to strengthen those public and private global governance efforts that aim to halt the deterioration of Earth system integrity, as well as to maintain and improve integrity, will it be able to offer a firm foundation of the type of Anthropocene Law, termed here as the Lex Anthropocenae , required to confront head-on the deep socio-ecological crisis of the Anthropocene.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2896315599
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1004793495 · CITES
- openalex:w104811708 · CITES
- openalex:w1489672447 · CITES
- openalex:w1967492775 · CITES
- openalex:w1998380343 · CITES
- openalex:w2019625409 · CITES
- openalex:w2036479846 · CITES
- openalex:w2043836348 · CITES
- openalex:w2046672867 · CITES
- openalex:w2103736591 · CITES
- openalex:w2105414963 · CITES
- openalex:w2106166864 · CITES
- openalex:w2113534314 · CITES
- openalex:w2121739590 · CITES
- openalex:w2169218869 · CITES
- openalex:w2230921575 · CITES
- openalex:w2252624440 · CITES
- openalex:w2263532705 · CITES
- openalex:w2269476587 · CITES
- openalex:w2287220709 · CITES
12 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. (2018). A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
- Chicago
- Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
- ISO 690
- Louis Jacobus Kotze; Duncan A. French. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. A critique of the Global Pact for the environment: a stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae?. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d863715693f92b762b2d28fbb2c461a7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 4eb001aa116baade · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
8c3b8b92c164513d · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
3f8d3acea6201e49 · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
d957bac6d3c431d2 · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
4eb001aa116baade · 2026-11-09T19:15:47.070292+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9417-x
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2896315599
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.