14 Serious Human Rights Violations as Potential Exceptions to Immunity: Conceptual Challenges
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1163/9789004251632_015
- Authors
- Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack
- Reported year
- 2014
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- book-chapter
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Regensburg
Documentary abstract — original language
Challenges" (2013) 2 state immunity in case of ius cogens violations.3 Meanwhile, the International Court of Justice in Jurisdictional Immunities 4 has confirmed the analysis given by Thomas Giegerich in 2004.In this volume, Michael Bothe and Christian Tomuschat comment on the Jurisdictional Immunities Case. 5 Whilst Christian Tomuschat is in line with the ICJ, Michael Bothe argues in favour of another solution as Isabelle Pingel did in 2004.This shall not be repeated here.Rather, the present chapter shall consider the debate from a meta-level.The question is not who is right, but why scholars and courts reach divergent results.Therefore, section 2 will distinguish three different approaches to the problem.Section 3 will then directly address the ethical foundation of international law. Three Different Approaches The Civilist Approach: Construing Legal RulesA series of scholars try to determine the limits of sovereign immunity by way of legal construction.They rely on accepted rules of international law which they apply to cases where a state has committed serious breaches of international human rights norms.This may be called a civilist approach.Some authors, for instance, contend that a state who violates fundamental human rights norms implicitly waives its immunity.6 Others apply the concept of 3 Isabelle Pingel, "L'immunité des États," in Tomuschat and Thouvenin, Fundamental Rules (n. 2), 239-48; Thomas Giegerich, "Do Damages Claims Arising from Jus Cogens Violations Override State Immunity from the Jurisdiction of Foreign Courts?," in Tomuschat and Thouvenin, Fundamental Rules (n. 2), 203-38.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W1496487512
- DOI
- 10.1163/9789004251632_015
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- book-chapter
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack. 14 Serious Human Rights Violations as Potential Exceptions to Immunity: Conceptual Challenges. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251632_015
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack. (2014). 14 Serious Human Rights Violations as Potential Exceptions to Immunity: Conceptual Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251632_015
- Chicago
- Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack. 14 Serious Human Rights Violations as Potential Exceptions to Immunity: Conceptual Challenges. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251632_015
- ISO 690
- Robert Uerpmann-Wittzack. 14 Serious Human Rights Violations as Potential Exceptions to Immunity: Conceptual Challenges. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251632_015
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. 14 Serious Human Rights Violations as Potential Exceptions to Immunity: Conceptual Challenges. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d83548d2e67bb80d2d9b177253fdd914/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 1dc3ea13d9c19507 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
82955bba878dde11 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
b115f7a02dc95472 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
ef2644b55745360f · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
1dc3ea13d9c19507 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.040676+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251632_015
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1496487512
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.