Protected area genocide in Ukraine: An aspect of genocide
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.32518/sals4.2023.132
- Authors
- Tetyana Nikolaychuk
- Reported year
- 2023
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Freiburg
Documentary abstract — original language
As the preserved territories of Ukraine are highly vulnerable and unique, pollution of these areas due to military aggression can have extremely negative consequences not only for Ukraine but also for the entire world, particularly for the international economy. The aim of the article is to explore the phenomenon of the genocide of preserved territories associated with military aggression as a distinct form of genocide and the connection between the negative impact on the environment and adverse fluctuations in the national market. The study employs methods of comprehensive literature analysis and expert assessments, involving a comparison of legal and Ukrainian scientific approaches. The legislative approach to defining “genocide of preserved territories” is analysed, and a monitoring of statistical data on the level of negative impact on the territories and objects of Ukraine’s natural reserve fund is conducted. The method of scientific generalization and graphical representation is used to visualize the results of the research. For evaluating the secondary results of shelling on regions with a high level of protection, specifically preserved territories and objects, a quantitative literature review, including meta-analysis, is conducted. Calculations reflecting the extent of destruction from bombing are performed, allowing observation of the most damaged areas and assessing the needs for their restoration. Immediate consequences (first level) and hidden long-term economic consequences on the market oriented towards ecology after the war are identified. The concept of the genocide of preserved territories is introduced, which not only helps highlight the negative consequences and the extent of damage to these unique territories and objects but can also be used as a tool for legally highlighting the impact on the entire country from the level of damage to preserved territories and objects. This concept can contribute to determining the violated rights of preserved territories and encourage increased investment in this sector. Additionally, the research can assist in assessing the connection between the level of environmental destruction and the suitability of these regions for environmentally focused business projects
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4391697977
- DOI
- 10.32518/sals4.2023.132
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- UA
- Natural entities mentioned
- Territory
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1539771510 · CITES
- openalex:w1963821553 · CITES
- openalex:w2016172992 · CITES
- openalex:w2080136270 · CITES
- Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide · CITES
- openalex:w2257944051 · CITES
- openalex:w2587276994 · CITES
- openalex:w2765907605 · CITES
- openalex:w2769783156 · CITES
- openalex:w2797429262 · CITES
- openalex:w2797959190 · CITES
- openalex:w2999226681 · CITES
- openalex:w3083921691 · CITES
- openalex:w3095811930 · CITES
- openalex:w3142353939 · CITES
- Should Trees have Standing?— Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
- openalex:w3185968790 · CITES
- openalex:w332511617 · CITES
- openalex:w4200301602 · CITES
- openalex:w4239659591 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Tetyana Nikolaychuk. Protected area genocide in Ukraine: An aspect of genocide. 2023. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.132
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Tetyana Nikolaychuk. (2023). Protected area genocide in Ukraine: An aspect of genocide. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.132
- Chicago
- Tetyana Nikolaychuk. Protected area genocide in Ukraine: An aspect of genocide. 2023. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.132
- ISO 690
- Tetyana Nikolaychuk. Protected area genocide in Ukraine: An aspect of genocide. 2023. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.132
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Protected area genocide in Ukraine: An aspect of genocide. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d5733f186035d141d4622ca988ae4e71/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 8d6f1db1f5b866b1 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
85ccef493cc0d4f7 · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
8ff4da610ee92b0b · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
14ea2be82b1d26c1 · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
8d6f1db1f5b866b1 · 2026-11-09T19:15:44.500671+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
UA ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.132
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4391697977
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.