UDTR Legal Library

UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6
Authors
Andrew Reid Bell · O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo · Apurva Bhargava · Alexander Bradley Duthie · Wei Zhang · Rebecca Sargent · Amy R. Lewis · Adams K. Kipchumba
Reported year
2023
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Bangor University · Boston University · Bristol Zoological Society · International Food Policy Research Institute · New York University · Save the Elephants · University of Antananarivo · University of Stirling

Documentary abstract — original language

Abstract Paying resource users to preserve features of their environment could in theory better align production and conservation goals. We show, however, that across a range of conservation dilemmas, they might not. We conduct a synthesis of dynamic games experiments built around collective action dilemmas in conservation, played across Europe, Africa, and Asia. We find, across this range of dilemmas, that while payments can encourage pro-conservation behavior, they often fail to capitalize on the potential for jointly improving productive and environmental outcomes, highlighting the more nuanced challenge of reconciling livelihoods with conservation goals. We further find production (yield) and the joint production-environment product (i.e., a measure of agricultural production multiplied by a measure of pro-conservation practice) are better preserved in groups that are more educated, more gender diverse and that better represent women. We discuss how the design of incentive programs can better align livelihood and environment goals.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W4319596308
DOI
10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1578221581 · CITES
  • openalex:w1977011897 · CITES
  • openalex:w1988376296 · CITES
  • openalex:w2007684262 · CITES
  • openalex:w2022044831 · CITES
  • openalex:w2061560059 · CITES
  • openalex:w2078771477 · CITES
  • openalex:w2098442768 · CITES
  • openalex:w2100135944 · CITES
  • openalex:w2109043109 · CITES
  • openalex:w2117546413 · CITES
  • openalex:w2125027030 · CITES
  • openalex:w2126612121 · CITES
  • openalex:w2153509701 · CITES
  • openalex:w2161250456 · CITES
  • openalex:w2195217458 · CITES
  • openalex:w2306627394 · CITES
  • openalex:w2317479922 · CITES
  • openalex:w2395677944 · CITES
  • openalex:w2479270762 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Andrew Reid Bell; O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo; Apurva Bhargava; Alexander Bradley Duthie; Wei Zhang; Rebecca Sargent; Amy R. Lewis; Adams K. Kipchumba. Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Andrew Reid Bell; O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo; Apurva Bhargava; Alexander Bradley Duthie; Wei Zhang; Rebecca Sargent; Amy R. Lewis; Adams K. Kipchumba. (2023). Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6
Chicago
Andrew Reid Bell; O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo; Apurva Bhargava; Alexander Bradley Duthie; Wei Zhang; Rebecca Sargent; Amy R. Lewis; Adams K. Kipchumba. Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6
ISO 690
Andrew Reid Bell; O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo; Apurva Bhargava; Alexander Bradley Duthie; Wei Zhang; Rebecca Sargent; Amy R. Lewis; Adams K. Kipchumba. Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Financial incentives often fail to reconcile agricultural productivity and pro-conservation behavior. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d3d2e2ccfe9500d3e41e60c9bc897add/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 1a2e181e6afab362 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

e6678a8b431c12ef · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00

03f2d2e501e335c5 · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00

0141d42c43250b46 · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00

1a2e181e6afab362 · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.765827+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Bangor University

Boston University

Bristol Zoological Society

International Food Policy Research Institute

New York University

Save the Elephants

University of Antananarivo

University of Stirling

Adams K. Kipchumba

Alexander Bradley Duthie

Amy R. Lewis

Andrew Reid Bell

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00689-6

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4319596308

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library