UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

LA COSMOVISIÓN Y SU DIMENSIÓN COLONIAL: LA PERSISTENCIA DE RACISMO EPISTÉMICO Y SU CONNOTACIÓN ÉTNICO-RACIAL EN EL ECUADOR

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.4067/s0717-73562024005001301

Authors

Edison Auqui-Calle · Lorena Cândido Fleury

Reported year

2024

Reported language

es

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:17:01.625600+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:17:01.625600+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Documentary abstract — original language

2,3,4 La cosmovisión es un concepto movilizado ampliamente por una multiplicidad de actores sociales, usada principalmente para reivindicar la diferencia étnica.Este artículo propone analizar las implicaciones del uso del concepto de cosmovisión a partir de su movilización por múltiples actores de la sociedad, principalmente la academia y el estado.Se fundamenta en un análisis sistemático de información disponible en las plataformas digitales respecto a artículos, políticas públicas, libros, propuestas e información obtenida en la base de datos de Scopus.El artículo expone la cosmovisión como una categoría usada desde enfoques cognitivistas y constructivistas que contienen en su seno diversas subjetividades relacionadas con el dominio de la etnicidad y pone de manifiesto determinados preceptos jerarquizantes y normativos con connotaciones étnico-raciales que coproducen, categorizan y deslegitiman las epistemes, ontologías y los sujetos envueltos.Tal gramática revela en su naturaleza ontológica la persistencia de un posicionamiento colonial y racismo epistémico que a menudo permanecen poco visibilizados y que contribuyen al silenciamiento de la heterogeneidad étnica y su alteridad.Palabras claves: deslegitimación, indígenas, cosmovisión, racismo.Worldview is a concept widely employed by a multiplicity of social actors, mainly to claim ethnic difference.This article aims to analyze the implications of using the concept of worldview based on its mobilization by multiple actors in society, primarily academia and the state.It draws on a systematic analysis of information available on digital platforms, including articles, public policies, books, proposals, and data obtained from the Scopus database.The article presents worldview as a category used from cognitivist and constructivist approaches, which inherently contains various subjectivities related to the domain of ethnicity.It highlights certain hierarchical and normative precepts with ethnic-racial connotations that co-produce, categorize, and delegitimize the epistemes, ontologies, and subjects involved.Such grammar reveals, in its ontological nature, the persistence of a colonial stance and epistemic racism that often go unnoticed, contributing to the silencing of ethnic heterogeneity and its otherness

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W4405496364

DOI

10.4067/s0717-73562024005001301

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

EC

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-73562024005001301
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4405496364

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w4210687409 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.