UDTR Legal Library

UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

The reform of collective forest rights in China and its implementation in the Fushun City Region

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.15287/afr.2014.210
Authors
S. Jiang · B.J. Lewis · L. Dai · W. Jia · Y. An
Reported year
2014
Reported language
en · und
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Chinese Academy of Sciences · College of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, No. 120 Dongling Rd., Shenyang, PRC 110161 · College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, No. 26 Hexing Rd., Harbin, PRC 150040 · Institute of Applied Ecology · Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Rd., Shenyang, PRC 110016 · Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Rd., Shenyang, PRC 110016; Forestry Department of Liaoning Province, No.2 North Taiyuan Street, Shenyang, PRC 110001 · Northeast Forestry University · Shenyang Agricultural University

Documentary abstract — original language

The paper provides an historical overview of the gradual but erratic evolution of collective forest rights in the People’s Republic of China. Forest tenure rights have been subject to numerous changes since the establishment of People’s Republic in 1949. In the most recent decades, use rights for forests have been transferred from collective to individual household-based with the intent to provide benefits to forest farmers. The implementation of the intended reforms has varied considerably from one province to another, with the majority of reform efforts originating in the southern provinces. This article looks at the major effort undertaken in Northeast China. The Fushun collective forest rights reform was analyzed using data obtained through field investigation by the Fushun Forestry Bureau. Initial effects of reform in terms of modes of rights assignment and farmer motivations to conduct forest management activities, as well as farmers’ income and financing conditions, are discussed. Remaining significant challenges are also briefly considered.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W1976558286
DOI
10.15287/afr.2014.210
ISSN
1844-8135 · 2065-2445

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
CN
Natural entities mentioned
Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

DOAJ · Record 1 · Record 2

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1574031902 · CITES
  • openalex:w1584972657 · CITES
  • openalex:w1600429647 · CITES
  • openalex:w1630845500 · CITES
  • openalex:w2074061242 · CITES
  • openalex:w2089953145 · CITES
  • openalex:w2101731416 · CITES
  • openalex:w2109624134 · CITES
  • openalex:w2127075504 · CITES
  • openalex:w2149482661 · CITES
  • openalex:w2161146600 · CITES
  • openalex:w2315587525 · CITES
  • openalex:w2381972980 · CITES
  • openalex:w3173145300 · CITES
  • openalex:w4206976335 · CITES
  • openalex:w6669206723 · CITES
  • openalex:w7033487412 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

S. Jiang; B.J. Lewis; L. Dai; W. Jia; Y. An. The reform of collective forest rights in China and its implementation in the Fushun City Region. 2014. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2014.210

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
S. Jiang; B.J. Lewis; L. Dai; W. Jia; Y. An. (2014). The reform of collective forest rights in China and its implementation in the Fushun City Region. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2014.210
Chicago
S. Jiang; B.J. Lewis; L. Dai; W. Jia; Y. An. The reform of collective forest rights in China and its implementation in the Fushun City Region. 2014. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2014.210
ISO 690
S. Jiang; B.J. Lewis; L. Dai; W. Jia; Y. An. The reform of collective forest rights in China and its implementation in the Fushun City Region. 2014. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2014.210

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The reform of collective forest rights in China and its implementation in the Fushun City Region. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-cd10eb23a8de93a0130bcd06be572f8e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version e4a1736d69ce30f9 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
Authors
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Year
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
Identifiers
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Source URL
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:50.075806+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

b390ef2f4c6ea51d · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00

1de33ed696d60e55 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00

8595008e199f645c · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00

e4a1736d69ce30f9 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.139777+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

CN ·

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Institute of Applied Ecology

Northeast Forestry University

Shenyang Agricultural University

B.J. Lewis

L. Dai

S. Jiang

W. Jia

Y. An

Source roles

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2014.210

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://www.afrjournal.org/index.php/afr/article/view/210

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1976558286

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library