TROPICAL FORESTRY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
- Authors
- Chantal Ngoa · Elvis Ewane · Lucie Etong
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Bamenda · University of Ngaoundéré · Université de Dschang
Documentary abstract — original language
Tropical forests in Southeast Asia play a critical role in biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, and supporting local livelihoods. Rapid deforestation, illegal logging, and land-use conflicts continue to undermine forest sustainability, highlighting persistent gaps between legal frameworks and practical implementation. Understanding these challenges is essential for developing effective governance strategies that balance ecological, social, and economic objectives. The study aims to evaluate the existing legal frameworks governing tropical forestry in Southeast Asia and to identify key barriers to effective implementation. It examines how laws, policies, and regulations are operationalized across multiple countries, with particular attention to enforcement mechanisms, stakeholder engagement, and alignment with sustainable forest management goals. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining legal document analysis, interviews with policymakers, forestry experts, and community representatives, and comparative assessment across selected Southeast Asian countries. Data were analyzed to assess the coherence, effectiveness, and practical challenges of forest governance systems. Findings reveal that while comprehensive legal frameworks exist, enforcement gaps, inconsistent policy application, limited technological monitoring, and insufficient community participation impede effective implementation. Countries with integrated governance mechanisms and participatory approaches demonstrate improved compliance and forest conservation outcomes. The study concludes that aligning legal frameworks with technological support and active stakeholder engagement is critical to enhancing tropical forest governance. Recommendations include adaptive policies, strengthened monitoring systems, and participatory mechanisms to ensure sustainable forest management.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7165357537
- DOI
- 10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w4388484129 · CITES
- openalex:w4389524796 · CITES
- openalex:w4391071504 · CITES
- openalex:w4391418088 · CITES
- openalex:w4391648972 · CITES
- openalex:w4393281938 · CITES
- openalex:w4402701118 · CITES
- openalex:w4402946098 · CITES
- openalex:w4403665125 · CITES
- openalex:w4403714438 · CITES
- openalex:w4407358855 · CITES
- openalex:w4409996646 · CITES
- openalex:w4411522437 · CITES
- Assessing the socio-psychological implications of Community Forest Resource (CFR) rights for forest-dwelling communities in Central India · CITES
- openalex:w4412523294 · CITES
- openalex:w4412615861 · CITES
- openalex:w4412702124 · CITES
- openalex:w4412753563 · CITES
- openalex:w4413029905 · CITES
- openalex:w4413276048 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Chantal Ngoa; Elvis Ewane; Lucie Etong. TROPICAL FORESTRY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. 2026. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Chantal Ngoa; Elvis Ewane; Lucie Etong. (2026). TROPICAL FORESTRY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
- Chicago
- Chantal Ngoa; Elvis Ewane; Lucie Etong. TROPICAL FORESTRY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. 2026. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
- ISO 690
- Chantal Ngoa; Elvis Ewane; Lucie Etong. TROPICAL FORESTRY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. 2026. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. TROPICAL FORESTRY LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c140381a0c1dec86ee1bacbe471c8a7d/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version a60a1ec2e04a03f5 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
b8ea666bfb0c6a4b · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
e735415efd129ab6 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
77cabeb461ed0763 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
a60a1ec2e04a03f5 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.034903+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v3i1.3546
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7165357537
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.