Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1111/cobi.13653
- Authors
- Simon Pooley · Saloni Bhatia · Anirudh G. Vasava
- Reported year
- 2020
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Birkbeck, University of London · Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · Union Bank of India · University of KwaZulu-Natal
Documentary abstract — original language
Although coexistence with wildlife is a key goal of conservation, little is known about it or how to study it. By coexistence we mean a sustainable though dynamic state in which humans and wildlife coadapt to sharing landscapes, where human interactions with wildlife are effectively governed to ensure wildlife populations persist in socially legitimate ways that ensure tolerable risk levels. Problems that arise from current conflict-oriented framing of human-wildlife interactions include reinforcing a human-nature dichotomy as fundamentally oppositional, suggesting coexistence requires the absence of conflict, and skewing research and management toward direct negative impacts over indirect impacts and positive aspects of living with wildlife. Human behavior toward wildlife is framed as rational calculus of costs and benefits, sidelining emotional and cultural dimensions of these interactions. Coexistence is less studied due to unfamiliarity with relevant methodologies, including qualitative methods, self-reflexivity and ethical rigor, and constraints on funding and time. These challenges are illustrated with examples from fieldwork in India and Africa. We recommend a basic approach to case studies aimed at expanding the scope of inquiries into human-wildlife relations beyond studies of rational behavior and quantification of costs and benefits of wildlife to humans.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W3092227641
- DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.13653
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Natural entities mentioned
- Landscape
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1558828271 · CITES
- openalex:w1560211453 · CITES
- openalex:w1636474393 · CITES
- openalex:w1762403233 · CITES
- openalex:w1909358283 · CITES
- openalex:w1969256937 · CITES
- openalex:w1996410521 · CITES
- openalex:w2000527637 · CITES
- openalex:w2008165483 · CITES
- openalex:w2033546119 · CITES
- openalex:w2039431624 · CITES
- openalex:w2039929621 · CITES
- openalex:w2054451538 · CITES
- openalex:w2074752875 · CITES
- openalex:w2093055946 · CITES
- openalex:w2094835389 · CITES
- openalex:w2105658843 · CITES
- openalex:w2117601181 · CITES
- openalex:w2125358851 · CITES
- openalex:w2146387095 · CITES
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Simon Pooley; Saloni Bhatia; Anirudh G. Vasava. Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13653
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Simon Pooley; Saloni Bhatia; Anirudh G. Vasava. (2020). Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13653
- Chicago
- Simon Pooley; Saloni Bhatia; Anirudh G. Vasava. Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13653
- ISO 690
- Simon Pooley; Saloni Bhatia; Anirudh G. Vasava. Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13653
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-bfedeac825ddd8b8753c8cf9155c9b10/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version a56b2959ab6fa6d8 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
7f562251ebb4fb6b · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
30c9ee2b848190f0 · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
d3a67e4ff3df1828 · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
a56b2959ab6fa6d8 · 2026-11-09T19:19:32.867037+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Birkbeck, University of London
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13653
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3092227641
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.