Constitutional Law and Judicial Activism: Guardianship and Reform in The Indian Democratic Framework
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
- Authors
- Utkarsh Mishra · Vir Vikram Bahadur Singh
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Rama University
Reported affiliation countries
IN
Documentary abstract — original language
Judicial activism serves as a dynamic instrument in upholding constitutional values and ensuring justice in a democratic framework. It signifies the proactive role of the judiciary in interpreting and expanding the scope of fundamental rights enshrined in the constitution. Through judicial activism, courts have not merely confined themselves to the literal interpretation of law but have also assumed the responsibility of addressing social injustices and governmental inaction. This approach enhances accountability and strengthens the rule of law by bridging the gap between the ideal and the real in governance. The evolution of judicial activism in India can be traced through landmark judgments such as KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA1 AND MANEKA GANDHI V. UNION OF INDIA2, where the judiciary asserted its power to review and protect constitutional supremacy. The emergence of public interest litigation (PIL) further extended access to justice, making the courts accessible to marginalized and voiceless sections of society. However, excessive judicial intervention has also raised concerns regarding the separation of powers and the potential encroachment upon legislative and executive functions. In essence, judicial activism acts as both a guardian and a reformer of constitutional principles, striving to maintain the balance between authority and liberty. It embodies the spirit of the constitution, ensuring that justice is not only done but also seen to be done in every aspect of public life.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7150883994
- DOI
- 10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Utkarsh Mishra; Vir Vikram Bahadur Singh. Constitutional Law and Judicial Activism: Guardianship and Reform in The Indian Democratic Framework. 2026. https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Utkarsh Mishra; Vir Vikram Bahadur Singh. (2026). Constitutional Law and Judicial Activism: Guardianship and Reform in The Indian Democratic Framework. https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
- Chicago
- Utkarsh Mishra; Vir Vikram Bahadur Singh. Constitutional Law and Judicial Activism: Guardianship and Reform in The Indian Democratic Framework. 2026. https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
- ISO 690
- Utkarsh Mishra; Vir Vikram Bahadur Singh. Constitutional Law and Judicial Activism: Guardianship and Reform in The Indian Democratic Framework. 2026. https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Constitutional Law and Judicial Activism: Guardianship and Reform in The Indian Democratic Framework. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-b09771e5b0a0749c9ad2ea28eb68f4ed/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version c917c3e18fb1aad6 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
591ea52e05e9c885 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
6ee066b36cfbf7e5 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
e421df8105af0306 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
c917c3e18fb1aad6 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.932602+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1715899
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7150883994
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.