Identifying Points of Contact and Engagement Between Legal and Environmental Education
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
- Authors
- Jane Holder
- Reported year
- 2013
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.909492+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University College London
Reported affiliation countries
GB
Documentary abstract — original language
This article explores the shaping and possibly reforming potential of ideas about sustainability in legal education by drawing up a scale of environmental education theories, arranged according to their propensity to transform radically university education. The article offers a critical analysis of current individualist strategies aimed at developing students' environmental skills, in particular that these hamper opportunities for universities to develop a broader and more creative agenda of social change. Applying ideas about how environmental education communities of practice develop, this article identifies some pockets of activity seeking to integrate ideas of sustainability into the law curriculum, including via environmental law and teaching Wild Law or Earth Jurisprudence. These issues form part of an on‐going debate about how well law students are being prepared for work in highly challenging social, environmental, and financial circumstances, against the backdrop of a broader question about ‘what are universities for?’
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2025860645
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::3e0b84e62e75cab77a9d6f72915ea594
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Jane Holder. Identifying Points of Contact and Engagement Between Legal and Environmental Education. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Jane Holder. (2013). Identifying Points of Contact and Engagement Between Legal and Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
- Chicago
- Jane Holder. Identifying Points of Contact and Engagement Between Legal and Environmental Education. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
- ISO 690
- Jane Holder. Identifying Points of Contact and Engagement Between Legal and Environmental Education. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Identifying Points of Contact and Engagement Between Legal and Environmental Education. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a9ce4637ea121b40af8ebc04f14aa011/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 5665a87e73238558 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:09:21.881649+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:09:21.881649+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:09:21.881649+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:09:21.881649+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:09:21.881649+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:09:21.881649+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
2bfacd423de54760 · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
e6ab925c1e00c26f · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
9c8e1400536e952a · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
5665a87e73238558 · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.313206+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00640.x
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2025860645
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.