UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.3390/w13243519
Authors
Lara Côrtes · Camila Gianella · Angela M. Páez · Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta
Reported year
2021
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Chr. Michelsen Institute · Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú · Tennessee State University · Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana · University of Bergen

Reported affiliation countries

CO · NO · PE · US

Documentary abstract — original language

In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.

Identifiers

DOI
10.3390/w13243519
OPENALEX
W4200566826
HANDLE
11250/2983333

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
BR · CO · PE

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1509806063 · CITES
  • openalex:w1510049154 · CITES
  • openalex:w1515499674 · CITES
  • openalex:w1838110103 · CITES
  • openalex:w1857288996 · CITES
  • openalex:w1873958906 · CITES
  • openalex:w1973445084 · CITES
  • openalex:w1983051325 · CITES
  • openalex:w2013573363 · CITES
  • openalex:w2033698343 · CITES
  • openalex:w2073146947 · CITES
  • openalex:w2082342289 · CITES
  • openalex:w2108793187 · CITES
  • openalex:w2116582479 · CITES
  • openalex:w2130300474 · CITES
  • openalex:w2139406405 · CITES
  • openalex:w2247055547 · CITES
  • openalex:w2293922131 · CITES
  • openalex:w2309730957 · CITES
  • openalex:w2529341555 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Lara Côrtes; Camila Gianella; Angela M. Páez; Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta. Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243519

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Lara Côrtes; Camila Gianella; Angela M. Páez; Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta. (2021). Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243519
Chicago
Lara Côrtes; Camila Gianella; Angela M. Páez; Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta. Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243519
ISO 690
Lara Côrtes; Camila Gianella; Angela M. Páez; Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta. Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243519

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a96ab2db91b128b7f133ec5ad3c05bd7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version e374b2068c48839a · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

f84764380ec32857 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00

c87b1ae120b12520 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00

796d7f6a640394b9 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00

e374b2068c48839a · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.841250+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

BR · CO · PE ·

Chr. Michelsen Institute

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

Tennessee State University

Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana

University of Bergen

Angela M. Páez

Camila Gianella

Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta

Lara Côrtes

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243519

Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2983333

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4200566826

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library