La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central)
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
- Authors
- Koehn, Lena
- Reported year
- 2022
- Reported language
- es · spa
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.840242+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.431709+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München (Múnich, Alemania)
Reported affiliation countries
DE
Documentary abstract — original language
The recognition of rights of nature is one of the most innovative aspects of the current Constitution of Ecuador and has attracted the attention of lawyers all over the world. This especially since 2019, when the Constitutional Court of Ecuador began to systematically concretize the abstract constitutional terms and examine the relation between rights of nature and other constitutional rights and guarantees. This paper aims to contribute to the latter by analyzing the constitutional guarantee of compulsory legislative (instead of e.g. administrative) regulation (reserva de ley) and the right to legal certainty and its role in defending rights of nature. After having introduced both constitutional concepts, the article proceeds to examine the Constitutional Court judgements n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (Mangrove Case) focusing on the guarantee of compulsory legislative regulation (reserva de ley) and legal certainty as means to protect rights of nature. It is shown, that through the discussed constitutional concepts the Constitutional Court of Ecuador has limited the administrative regulation of rights of nature appealing to the responsibility of the legislator in matters of fundamental constitutional relevance, among them, rights of nature. The paper concludes that Constitutional Court of Ecuador thereby not only defends rights of nature but also strengthens participative democracy. Los derechos de la naturaleza son uno de los aspectos más innovadores de la Constitución de Ecuador, y han atraído la atenciówn de juristas tanto ecuatorianos como internacionales. Con el desarrollo de los derechos de la naturaleza por parte —sobre todo— de la Corte Constitucional a partir de 2019, se ha empezado a concretar el contenido de dichos derechos abstractos y a discutir la relación entre los derechos de la naturaleza y otros derechos y garantías. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo hacer un aporte a este último punto, desarrollando los límites que imponen la garantía de la reserva de ley y el derecho a la seguridad jurídica en actos privados y estatales, en el contexto de los derechos de la naturaleza. Para ello, primero se analizarán la reserva de ley y el derecho a la seguridad jurídica en el contexto jurídico ecuatoriano. Luego, se examinarán dichos conceptos en relación con los derechos de la naturaleza a través de un análisis de las sentencias constitucionales n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (caso Manglares). Como se podrá evidenciar, la Corte Constitucional ha fortalecido sustancialmente el papel del legislador en proyectos con incidencia en los derechos de la naturaleza: un aporte esencial para tutelar tales derechos y al mismo tiempo reforzar la democracia participativa.
Identifiers
- HANDLE
- 10644/9262
- DOI
- 10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::0e96500ac1fbb12e75b5f154901b64d0 · od______3056::33a0b950cdd036d18aba44c3f4a30f29
- ISSN
- 2953-6782
- OAI
- oai:repositorio.uasb.edu.ec:10644/9262
- OPENALEX
- W6992260166
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · Other ORP type · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
DOAJ · Record 1
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3 · Record 4
Repository · Record 1
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
- Document · http://hdl.handle.net/10644/9262
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10644/9262
- Document · https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W6992260166
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w3108700128 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Koehn, Lena. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). 2022. https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Koehn, Lena. (2022). La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
- Chicago
- Koehn, Lena. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). 2022. https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
- ISO 690
- Koehn, Lena. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). 2022. https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a670a95ee34df3df3fb263f05476b081/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 017fe22a3b9e51ee · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Authors
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Identifiers
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.120869+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
a63b6a1c334d48b7 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784576+00:00
76ed86a306d9f15a · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784576+00:00
a21735c112db4807 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784576+00:00
466bde46941e2512 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.431709+00:00
017fe22a3b9e51ee · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.431709+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/10644/9262
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10644/9262
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W6992260166
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.