UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central)

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
Authors
Koehn, Lena
Reported year
2022
Reported language
es · spa
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.840242+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-10T16:58:51.431709+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München (Múnich, Alemania)

Reported affiliation countries

DE

Documentary abstract — original language

The recognition of rights of nature is one of the most innovative aspects of the current Constitution of Ecuador and has attracted the attention of lawyers all over the world. This especially since 2019, when the Constitutional Court of Ecuador began to systematically concretize the abstract constitutional terms and examine the relation between rights of nature and other constitutional rights and guarantees. This paper aims to contribute to the latter by analyzing the constitutional guarantee of compulsory legislative (instead of e.g. administrative) regulation (reserva de ley) and the right to legal certainty and its role in defending rights of nature. After having introduced both constitutional concepts, the article proceeds to examine the Constitutional Court judgements n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (Mangrove Case) focusing on the guarantee of compulsory legislative regulation (reserva de ley) and legal certainty as means to protect rights of nature. It is shown, that through the discussed constitutional concepts the Constitutional Court of Ecuador has limited the administrative regulation of rights of nature appealing to the responsibility of the legislator in matters of fundamental constitutional relevance, among them, rights of nature. The paper concludes that Constitutional Court of Ecuador thereby not only defends rights of nature but also strengthens participative democracy. Los derechos de la naturaleza son uno de los aspectos más innovadores de la Constitución de Ecuador, y han atraído la atenciówn de juristas tanto ecuatorianos como internacionales. Con el desarrollo de los derechos de la naturaleza por parte —sobre todo— de la Corte Constitucional a partir de 2019, se ha empezado a concretar el contenido de dichos derechos abstractos y a discutir la relación entre los derechos de la naturaleza y otros derechos y garantías. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo hacer un aporte a este último punto, desarrollando los límites que imponen la garantía de la reserva de ley y el derecho a la seguridad jurídica en actos privados y estatales, en el contexto de los derechos de la naturaleza. Para ello, primero se analizarán la reserva de ley y el derecho a la seguridad jurídica en el contexto jurídico ecuatoriano. Luego, se examinarán dichos conceptos en relación con los derechos de la naturaleza a través de un análisis de las sentencias constitucionales n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (caso Manglares). Como se podrá evidenciar, la Corte Constitucional ha fortalecido sustancialmente el papel del legislador en proyectos con incidencia en los derechos de la naturaleza: un aporte esencial para tutelar tales derechos y al mismo tiempo reforzar la democracia participativa.

Identifiers

HANDLE
10644/9262
DOI
10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
OPENAIRE
doi_dedup___::0e96500ac1fbb12e75b5f154901b64d0 · od______3056::33a0b950cdd036d18aba44c3f4a30f29
ISSN
2953-6782
OAI
oai:repositorio.uasb.edu.ec:10644/9262
OPENALEX
W6992260166

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
Article · Other ORP type · article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
EC

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

DOAJ · Record 1

OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3 · Record 4

Repository · Record 1

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w3108700128 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Koehn, Lena. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). 2022. https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Koehn, Lena. (2022). La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
Chicago
Koehn, Lena. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). 2022. https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1
ISO 690
Koehn, Lena. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). 2022. https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (Tema Central). Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a670a95ee34df3df3fb263f05476b081/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 017fe22a3b9e51ee · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Authors
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Year
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Identifiers
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
Repository_UASB · 2026-11-09T19:07:35.315942+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Source URL
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476982+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.120869+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

a63b6a1c334d48b7 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784576+00:00

76ed86a306d9f15a · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784576+00:00

a21735c112db4807 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784576+00:00

466bde46941e2512 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.431709+00:00

017fe22a3b9e51ee · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.431709+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

EC ·

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Koehn, Lena

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.32719/29536782.2022.2.1

Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/10644/9262

Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10644/9262

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W6992260166

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library