An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand
Identification
- Public canonical key
- openalex:w1858138266
- Authors
- Robert James Miller · Jacinta Ruru
- Reported year
- 2008
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Arizona State University · University of Otago
Reported affiliation countries
NZ · US
Documentary abstract — original language
North America and New Zealand were colonized by England under an international legal principle that is known today as the Doctrine of Discovery. When Europeans set out to explore and exploit new lands in the fifteenth through the twentieth centuries, they justified their sovereign and property claims over these territories and the Indigenous people with the Discovery Doctrine. \n \nThis legal principle was justified by religious and ethnocentric ideas of European and Christian superiority over the other cultures, religions, and races of the world. The Doctrine provided that newly-arrived Europeans automatically acquired property rights in the lands of Native people and gained political and commercial rights over the inhabitants. England was an avid supporter of the Doctrine and used it around the world. \n \nThe English colonial governments and colonists in New Zealand and America, and later the American state and federal governments and New Zealand governments, all utilized Discovery and still use it today to exercise legal rights to Native lands and to control their Indigenous people. \n \nIn this article, the authors, an American Indian and a New Zealand Maori, use a comparative law methodology to trace and compare the legal and historical application of Discovery in both countries. The evidence uncovered helps to explain the current state of United States Indian law and the New Zealand law relating to Maoris. While the countries did not apply the elements of Discovery in the exact same manner, and at the same time periods, the similarities of their use of Discovery are striking and not the least bit surprising since the Doctrine was English law. Viewing American and New Zealand history in light of the international law Doctrine of Discovery helps to expand one's knowledge of both countries and their Indigenous peoples.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W1858138266
- HANDLE
- 10523/8689
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- NZ · US
- Natural entities mentioned
- Territory
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- Document · http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8689
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10523/8689
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W1858138266
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. 2008. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. (2008). An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/
- Chicago
- Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. 2008. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/
- ISO 690
- Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. 2008. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version bc6deb73bdb066bc · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
611515d910cec747 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
d72edf1f21feb871 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
07f7f7b176ef59e2 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
bc6deb73bdb066bc · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8689
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10523/8689
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1858138266
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.