UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand

Identification

Public canonical key
openalex:w1858138266
Authors
Robert James Miller · Jacinta Ruru
Reported year
2008
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Arizona State University · University of Otago

Reported affiliation countries

NZ · US

Documentary abstract — original language

North America and New Zealand were colonized by England under an international legal principle that is known today as the Doctrine of Discovery. When Europeans set out to explore and exploit new lands in the fifteenth through the twentieth centuries, they justified their sovereign and property claims over these territories and the Indigenous people with the Discovery Doctrine. \n \nThis legal principle was justified by religious and ethnocentric ideas of European and Christian superiority over the other cultures, religions, and races of the world. The Doctrine provided that newly-arrived Europeans automatically acquired property rights in the lands of Native people and gained political and commercial rights over the inhabitants. England was an avid supporter of the Doctrine and used it around the world. \n \nThe English colonial governments and colonists in New Zealand and America, and later the American state and federal governments and New Zealand governments, all utilized Discovery and still use it today to exercise legal rights to Native lands and to control their Indigenous people. \n \nIn this article, the authors, an American Indian and a New Zealand Maori, use a comparative law methodology to trace and compare the legal and historical application of Discovery in both countries. The evidence uncovered helps to explain the current state of United States Indian law and the New Zealand law relating to Maoris. While the countries did not apply the elements of Discovery in the exact same manner, and at the same time periods, the similarities of their use of Discovery are striking and not the least bit surprising since the Doctrine was English law. Viewing American and New Zealand history in light of the international law Doctrine of Discovery helps to expand one's knowledge of both countries and their Indigenous peoples.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W1858138266
HANDLE
10523/8689

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
NZ · US
Natural entities mentioned
Territory

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

    1 incoming references within the detected corpus

    Documentary field provenance

    Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

    Title
    Documentary source reported
    Publication
    Documentary source reported
    Authors
    Documentary source reported
    Document type
    Documentary source reported
    Jurisdiction
    Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
    Court
    Not recorded
    Issuing authority
    Not recorded
    Publisher
    Not recorded
    DOI
    Not recorded
    ISBN
    Not recorded
    Official identifier
    Not recorded
    Source URL
    Documentary source reported
    Source-reported status
    Not recorded
    Amendment / repeal
    Not recorded

    Cite this reference

    Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. 2008. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/

    JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

    APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

    APA
    Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. (2008). An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/
    Chicago
    Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. 2008. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/
    ISO 690
    Robert James Miller; Jacinta Ruru. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. 2008. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/

    UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a455189d2c1d7f45f82af28996cefb7e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

    Report a correction

    Field provenance and record version

    Version bc6deb73bdb066bc · udtr-reference-1.1.2

    Title
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
    Authors
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
    Year
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
    Identifiers
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00
    Source URL
    OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00

    History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

    611515d910cec747 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00

    d72edf1f21feb871 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00

    07f7f7b176ef59e2 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00

    bc6deb73bdb066bc · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.733147+00:00

    Frozen-version metadata

    Research dossiers and documentary relations

    NZ · US ·

    Arizona State University

    University of Otago

    Jacinta Ruru

    Robert James Miller

    Source roles

    Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/10523/8689

    Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10523/8689

    Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1858138266

    An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

    Documentary status

    Relevance pending

    Library

    This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

    UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library