Legal status of former customary land ownership evidence after its validity period expires: Assessment of the legal certainty over Indigenous peoples’ land rights
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.31548/law/3.2025.160
- Authors
- Elfira Zahwa Octavia · Mohammad Hamidi Masykur · Moh Fadil
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Brawijaya
Documentary abstract — original language
This study examined the legal protection afforded to holders of written evidence of former customary land ownership in Indonesia, particularly in the context of Article 96(2) of Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 “On the Management Rights, Land Rights, and Land Registration”, which renders such documents invalid after five years. The provision raises significant concerns regarding legal certainty and the constitutional rights of Indigenous communities. Employing a normative juridical method and a conceptual approach, the study analysed the tension between state-imposed administrative requirements and the historically rooted recognition of land ownership under customary law. The findings indicated that the sudden invalidation of traditional land documents without transitional mechanisms creates legal exclusion and deepens structural inequality, particularly among rural and Indigenous populations with limited access to legal resources. The analysis demonstrated that such a policy undermines the principles of procedural fairness, legitimate expectations, and the protection of property rights as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia and international human rights instruments. The study argued for a rights-based and restorative framework to ensure transitional legal protection and the recognition of non-formal evidence rooted in Indigenous traditions. This approach is essential for aligning agrarian policy with justice, inclusivity, and constitutional obligations
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4415402059
- DOI
- 10.31548/law/3.2025.160
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- ID
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w2475595247 · CITES
- openalex:w2941056843 · CITES
- Community land formalization and company land acquisition procedures: A review of 33 procedures in 15 countries · CITES
- openalex:w3007583773 · CITES
- openalex:w3034034967 · CITES
- Removing the Veil from the ‘Rights of Nature’: The Dichotomy between First Nations Customary Rights and Environmental Legal Personhood · CITES
- openalex:w3191751607 · CITES
- openalex:w4200028576 · CITES
- openalex:w4224979558 · CITES
- openalex:w4295120396 · CITES
- openalex:w4361255985 · CITES
- openalex:w4388882484 · CITES
- openalex:w4389134133 · CITES
- openalex:w4402720992 · CITES
- openalex:w4404769976 · CITES
- openalex:w4405184228 · CITES
- openalex:w4407949129 · CITES
- openalex:w4408804183 · CITES
- Beyond Formality: Transforming FPIC into a Tool for Indigenous Empowerment · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Elfira Zahwa Octavia; Mohammad Hamidi Masykur; Moh Fadil. Legal status of former customary land ownership evidence after its validity period expires: Assessment of the legal certainty over Indigenous peoples’ land rights. 2025. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/3.2025.160
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Elfira Zahwa Octavia; Mohammad Hamidi Masykur; Moh Fadil. (2025). Legal status of former customary land ownership evidence after its validity period expires: Assessment of the legal certainty over Indigenous peoples’ land rights. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/3.2025.160
- Chicago
- Elfira Zahwa Octavia; Mohammad Hamidi Masykur; Moh Fadil. Legal status of former customary land ownership evidence after its validity period expires: Assessment of the legal certainty over Indigenous peoples’ land rights. 2025. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/3.2025.160
- ISO 690
- Elfira Zahwa Octavia; Mohammad Hamidi Masykur; Moh Fadil. Legal status of former customary land ownership evidence after its validity period expires: Assessment of the legal certainty over Indigenous peoples’ land rights. 2025. https://doi.org/10.31548/law/3.2025.160
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Legal status of former customary land ownership evidence after its validity period expires: Assessment of the legal certainty over Indigenous peoples’ land rights. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-9fea663e24007a0cffff6d520fb3d2b8/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 8899f7b6fe0d968c · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
479b5cd03404c00a · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
7d703c2f042f057a · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
6ed5dc7e9ae6db7d · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
8899f7b6fe0d968c · 2026-11-09T19:17:40.296145+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
ID ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.31548/law/3.2025.160
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4415402059
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.