Consulta popular en Ecuador: análisis jurídico de los efectos retroactivos en el marco constitucional ecuatoriano. Análisis del caso – dictamen N.º 1-20-CP/20
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-859d38b5d90fa0a3a481f354e5c0ce99
- Authors
- Danny Ulises
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- es · spa
- Source type
- Bachelor thesis
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:07:01.669112+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
El presente estudio, tiene como objetivo analizar los límites de la consulta popular como mecanismo de participación ciudadana frente al derecho a la seguridad jurídica a la luz del dictamen 1-20-CP/20. Este análisis consta de tres capítulos: el primero determina los alcances y limitaciones que han sido establecidos en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional respecto al ejercicio de la consulta popular como mecanismo de participación ciudadana; el segundo especifica cómo el dictamen delimita la protección del derecho a la seguridad jurídica en el marco de la realización de una consulta popular, y el tercer capítulo brinda un análisis sucinto respecto del alcance de los derechos de la naturaleza como titular de derechos y su posible vulneración frente a las actividades mineras. Se usó la técnica de la dogmática jurídica. The purpose of this study is to analyze the limits of referendums as a mechanism for citizen participation in relation to the right to legal certainty in light of ruling 1-20-CP/20. This analysis consists of three chapters: the first determines the scope and limitations that have been established in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court regarding the use of referendums as a mechanism for citizen participation; the second specifies how the ruling delimits the protection of the right to legal certainty in the context of a referendum, and the third chapter provides a succinct analysis of the scope of the rights of nature as a rights holder and their possible violation in relation to mining activities. The technique of legal dogmatics was used.
Identifiers
- OPENAIRE
- od______1737::964d14ea9e0165f575a2a5f25fd949bd
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Thesis
- Source-reported types
- Bachelor thesis
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Instrument versions and official source
Source unresolved
Documentary identity verification only: a link or date establishes neither full-text verification, legal effect nor current force.
Possible duplicate awaiting documentary verification.
Status from the preserved documentary extraction: Unestablished
Cite this reference
Danny Ulises. Consulta popular en Ecuador: análisis jurídico de los efectos retroactivos en el marco constitucional ecuatoriano. Análisis del caso – dictamen N.º 1-20-CP/20. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-859d38b5d90fa0a3a481f354e5c0ce99/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Danny Ulises. (2026). Consulta popular en Ecuador: análisis jurídico de los efectos retroactivos en el marco constitucional ecuatoriano. Análisis del caso – dictamen N.º 1-20-CP/20. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-859d38b5d90fa0a3a481f354e5c0ce99/
- Chicago
- Danny Ulises. Consulta popular en Ecuador: análisis jurídico de los efectos retroactivos en el marco constitucional ecuatoriano. Análisis del caso – dictamen N.º 1-20-CP/20. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-859d38b5d90fa0a3a481f354e5c0ce99/
- ISO 690
- Danny Ulises. Consulta popular en Ecuador: análisis jurídico de los efectos retroactivos en el marco constitucional ecuatoriano. Análisis del caso – dictamen N.º 1-20-CP/20. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-859d38b5d90fa0a3a481f354e5c0ce99/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Consulta popular en Ecuador: análisis jurídico de los efectos retroactivos en el marco constitucional ecuatoriano. Análisis del caso – dictamen N.º 1-20-CP/20. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-859d38b5d90fa0a3a481f354e5c0ce99/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 867ca7288c4dbcf6 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
- Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
26048c5395e35c58 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
985b67c59d3d3bd6 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
3b1f8f58d304b12f · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
867ca7288c4dbcf6 · 2026-11-09T19:07:41.784147+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
Source roles
Institutional bibliographic repository · http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/33073
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.