Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
- Authors
- Keval Govardhan Ukey · Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik
- Reported year
- 2024
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping various sectors in India, including healthcare, finance, governance, and surveillance. However, the country currently lacks a dedicated legal framework to address the ethical, legal, and privacy challenges posed by AI. The rapid adoption of AI technologies has introduced concerns such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, privacy vulnerabilities, and accountability issues gaps that existing laws fail to fully cover. This paper critically examines the inadequacies of India’s current AI-related legal framework and assesses the limitations of existing legislation, such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. While these laws regulate certain digital activities, they do not specifically address AI-related risks, such as the explainability of AI-driven decisions, liability issues, and mechanisms to prevent automated bias and discrimination. The paper also explores global AI regulatory models, including the European Union’s AI Act, the United States’ Algorithmic Accountability Act, and China’s AI governance framework, to draw insights from international best practices. Additionally, the study highlights the urgent need for a specialized AI law in India to promote responsible AI governance. It suggests a legal framework that includes AI risk classification, mandatory AI impact assessments, transparency mandates, and accountability mechanisms. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of public awareness and ethical AI deployment standards to foster a fair and inclusive AI ecosystem. By addressing these gaps through a dedicated legal framework, India can strike a balance between AI innovation and the protection of fundamental rights, ensuring AI serves society in an ethical and equitable manner.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7220463254
- DOI
- 10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. 2024. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. (2024). Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
- Chicago
- Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. 2024. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
- ISO 690
- Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. 2024. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-8289d3e43f23b4cd4e7dd99cf34ff629/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 0b547bb6781e3877 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
95fa7ffe43d7c8a3 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
41d335abe21217aa · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
d12a07f918276907 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
0b547bb6781e3877 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
IN ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7220463254
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.