UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
Authors
Keval Govardhan Ukey · Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik
Reported year
2024
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping various sectors in India, including healthcare, finance, governance, and surveillance. However, the country currently lacks a dedicated legal framework to address the ethical, legal, and privacy challenges posed by AI. The rapid adoption of AI technologies has introduced concerns such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, privacy vulnerabilities, and accountability issues gaps that existing laws fail to fully cover. This paper critically examines the inadequacies of India’s current AI-related legal framework and assesses the limitations of existing legislation, such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. While these laws regulate certain digital activities, they do not specifically address AI-related risks, such as the explainability of AI-driven decisions, liability issues, and mechanisms to prevent automated bias and discrimination. The paper also explores global AI regulatory models, including the European Union’s AI Act, the United States’ Algorithmic Accountability Act, and China’s AI governance framework, to draw insights from international best practices. Additionally, the study highlights the urgent need for a specialized AI law in India to promote responsible AI governance. It suggests a legal framework that includes AI risk classification, mandatory AI impact assessments, transparency mandates, and accountability mechanisms. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of public awareness and ethical AI deployment standards to foster a fair and inclusive AI ecosystem. By addressing these gaps through a dedicated legal framework, India can strike a balance between AI innovation and the protection of fundamental rights, ensuring AI serves society in an ethical and equitable manner.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W7220463254
DOI
10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
IN
Natural entities mentioned
Ecosystem

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. 2024. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. (2024). Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
Chicago
Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. 2024. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260
ISO 690
Keval Govardhan Ukey; Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. 2024. https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Legislative Gaps in India’s AI Regulation: Need for A Dedicated AI Law. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-8289d3e43f23b4cd4e7dd99cf34ff629/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 0b547bb6781e3877 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

95fa7ffe43d7c8a3 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00

41d335abe21217aa · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00

d12a07f918276907 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00

0b547bb6781e3877 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.788342+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

IN ·

Keval Govardhan Ukey

Mrs. Tanavi Prasad Naik

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i2.8260

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7220463254

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library