Struggles for just conservation: an analysis of India's biodiversity conservation conflicts
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.2458/jpe.5214
- Authors
- Eleonora Fanari
- Reported year
- 2022
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Documentary abstract — original language
The protection of the Earth's remaining biodiversity continues to be a debate of global importance as well as a source of contestation. In this context, the Indian government started with its post-colonial forest conservation from the 1970s, by ushering in the Wildlife Protection Act in 1972. It has since reinforced its conservation policies, over the last 15 years giving particular focus to the protection of tigers, considered a keystone and endangered species. In 2004, a Tiger Task Force was set up to protect the tiger, followed by the establishment of protected habitats for tiger conservation, which in turn reinforced the idea of a human-wildlife binary and legitimized the control of these spaces through armed policing. These changes in environmental governance have altered the relationship between local communities and forest guards, in many cases aggravating already conflictual interactions. This article discusses the political ecology of emerging conflicts around protected areas (national parks, tiger reserves and wildlife sanctuaries) in India through an analysis of 26 conflicts documented in the Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas), and informed by field research conducted within and around protected areas of India. Specifically, the article analyzes the interplay between conservation policies and the rights of the commons recognized under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, as well as the socio-economic impacts of conservation policies in terms of dispossession, violence and the increase of "green militarization." The article also highlights the social resistance movements developed against these trends, which are framed as part of the growing environmental justice movement. The article concludes with how this struggle may be essential to achieving an ecologically sustainable society in the future and to shape a new conservation model.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4293288875
- DOI
- 10.2458/jpe.5214
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest · Species
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1192310461 · CITES
- openalex:w1199351435 · CITES
- openalex:w1512901091 · CITES
- openalex:w1520920523 · CITES
- openalex:w1524636885 · CITES
- openalex:w1572125629 · CITES
- openalex:w1579651887 · CITES
- openalex:w1597633336 · CITES
- openalex:w1797402740 · CITES
- openalex:w1800005068 · CITES
- openalex:w1925757661 · CITES
- openalex:w1938845323 · CITES
- openalex:w1944152523 · CITES
- openalex:w1974714510 · CITES
- openalex:w2007098848 · CITES
- openalex:w2008114235 · CITES
- openalex:w2009146964 · CITES
- openalex:w2012735301 · CITES
- openalex:w201309109 · CITES
- openalex:w2019011677 · CITES
5 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Eleonora Fanari. Struggles for just conservation: an analysis of India's biodiversity conservation conflicts. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5214
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Eleonora Fanari. (2022). Struggles for just conservation: an analysis of India's biodiversity conservation conflicts. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5214
- Chicago
- Eleonora Fanari. Struggles for just conservation: an analysis of India's biodiversity conservation conflicts. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5214
- ISO 690
- Eleonora Fanari. Struggles for just conservation: an analysis of India's biodiversity conservation conflicts. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5214
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Struggles for just conservation: an analysis of India's biodiversity conservation conflicts. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-75ec1447ea4a8a8dbf684f8fe453d94f/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version ab26c613e93782bf · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
bce29eb89e282fe3 · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
495571863149b5bc · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
4942a95c567d6ab2 · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
ab26c613e93782bf · 2026-11-09T19:15:42.290713+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
IN ·
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5214
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4293288875
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.