The Wild Law Judgment Project
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.4324/9781315618319-1
- Authors
- Nicole Rogers · Michelle Maloney
- Reported year
- 2017
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- book-chapter
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
The Wild Law Judgment Project has been inspired by various feminist judgment writing projects and in particular by the Australian feminist judgment project, in which judgments from all areas of Australian law have been rewritten from a feminist perspective. The idea behind the Wild Law Judgment Project was that judgments, selected from any area of law, would be viewed and rewritten through a wild law lens. In the Wild Law Judgment Project, wild law seeps into other areas of the legal system including constitutional law, international law, torts, criminal law, administrative law, intellectual property law and native title law. The looming crisis of climate change has influenced three rewritten Australian environmental law judgments, which deal with challenges to proposed coalmine developments. The judgments from the Wild Law Judgment Project constitute a coherent body of wild law judgments which may lack the 'force of law' or conventional legitimacy but which have a powerful political and educative value.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2620962307
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781315618319-1
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::1203f4a4e5fb355add83c6243faa4db8
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- Part of book or chapter of book · book-chapter
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Nicole Rogers; Michelle Maloney. The Wild Law Judgment Project. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-1
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Nicole Rogers; Michelle Maloney. (2017). The Wild Law Judgment Project. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-1
- Chicago
- Nicole Rogers; Michelle Maloney. The Wild Law Judgment Project. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-1
- ISO 690
- Nicole Rogers; Michelle Maloney. The Wild Law Judgment Project. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-1
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The Wild Law Judgment Project. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-7483b914cb8d51f29a64d0c331f793e2/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 7b3c10fcefdb168b · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.525305+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
007b8a6999122c7f · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
66a38098ddc89ca6 · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
0e2705e04c24eedf · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
7b3c10fcefdb168b · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.419693+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-1
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2620962307
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.