Unveiling the Shortcomings of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Farmer Empowerment Initiatives
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
- Authors
- Moh. Andika Lawasi
- Reported year
- 2024
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
National Research and Innovation Agency
Reported affiliation countries
ID
Documentary abstract — original language
Since being designated a national strategic program under President Joko Widodo’s administration, social forestry has yet to significantly alleviate poverty or improve the welfare of communities around forests. Despite the ambitious goal of allocating 12.7 million ha through various schemes such as community forests, village forests, customary forests, community plantation forests, and forestry partnerships, the welfare indicators for forest farmers remain largely unchanged. An in-depth investigation into the shortcomings associated with this program is necessary to uncover why it has yet to achieve its fundamental objectives. A comprehensive literature review involving critical analysis of various sources-including Google Scholar, Scopus, government websites, books, and other materials totaling 95 references, was conducted to examine the various dimensions influencing this program. The results reveal several impediments, including inadequate financial support and fragmented stakeholder collaboration, insufficient operational supervision in program implementation, weak motivation and capacity in institutional management, access inequality, conflict management, and underdeveloped post-harvest processing and networking capacities. Knowledge, technology, technical management, and policy information inputs are also insufficient. Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach, beginning with enhanced technical assistance, stronger program oversight, better institutional management, and improved capacities for market-oriented management of social forestry products and services. Keywords: critical analysis, farmer empowerment, forest management, marginalized groups, social forestry
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4402883587
- DOI
- 10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- ID
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w120384207 · CITES
- Reformasi tenurial hutan di Indonesia: Kapan? Apa? Mengapa? · CITES
- Social Forestry - why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia · CITES
- openalex:w2891062756 · CITES
- What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia · CITES
- openalex:w2943108000 · CITES
- openalex:w2943287452 · CITES
- Connecting social forestry to conservation policies in Tanah Papua · CITES
- openalex:w2943519333 · CITES
- openalex:w2943826170 · CITES
- openalex:w2946388012 · CITES
- openalex:w2950079160 · CITES
- openalex:w2964523010 · CITES
- Local people awareness towards social forestry program: a case study of Ogan Komering Ulu District, South Sumatra Province, Indonesia · CITES
- openalex:w2978438329 · CITES
- Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia · CITES
- openalex:w2985407047 · CITES
- openalex:w2991123131 · CITES
- openalex:w2992803074 · CITES
- openalex:w2995116335 · CITES
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Moh. Andika Lawasi. Unveiling the Shortcomings of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Farmer Empowerment Initiatives. 2024. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Moh. Andika Lawasi. (2024). Unveiling the Shortcomings of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Farmer Empowerment Initiatives. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
- Chicago
- Moh. Andika Lawasi. Unveiling the Shortcomings of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Farmer Empowerment Initiatives. 2024. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
- ISO 690
- Moh. Andika Lawasi. Unveiling the Shortcomings of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Farmer Empowerment Initiatives. 2024. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Unveiling the Shortcomings of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Farmer Empowerment Initiatives. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-6e7fcad2536fa03350ed9f4a7ded1b71/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 52c15deb43c01e7d · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
1eafed2fca957dad · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
a38275aa64da69b3 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
0d23186153748740 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
52c15deb43c01e7d · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.805472+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
ID ·
National Research and Innovation Agency
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i3.945
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4402883587
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.