UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

通过 "重申--自由 "程序保护基本自由 奥利维耶-勒博特

Identification

Public canonical key

radar:r-682dbc39fe2cb0efb2a951b96fc39ef2

Authors

Olivier Le Bot

Reported year

—

Reported language

zh

Source type

THESE

First detected

2026-11-13T08:39:01.259781+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-13T08:39:01.259781+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Aix Marseille Université

Documentary abstract — original language

The summary procedure for fundamental freedoms is an entirely new procedure introduced into the law of administrative litigation by Law no. 2000-597 of 30 June 2000. The introduction of this original mechanism for the protection of fundamental freedoms very quickly met with great success among applicants. However, in practice, few applications are successful. The The discrepancy observed between the attractiveness of this procedure and its real benefit for litigants raises questions about the usefulness, characteristics and nature of this legal remedy. of this legal remedy. It appears, on the one hand, that the procedure under Article L. 521-2 of the Code of Administrative Justice is designed to combat situations that Code of Administrative Justice is designed to combat situations which, because of their seriousness are of an exceptional nature. The law requires that a serious and manifestly illegal unlawful infringement of a fundamental freedom and requires the intervention of a the intervention of a judge at very short notice to put an end to it. On the other hand, this legal remedy derogates from the ordinary law of administrative proceedings in order to offer the alleged victim of of an infringement a particularly extensive protection of his fundamental freedoms. freedoms. In a logic of ordinary Latin American amparo, the référé-liberté guarantees litigants rapid and effective jurisdictional protection of their freedoms in their freedoms in exceptional situations where these are seriously jeopardised by the by the acts and actions of public authorities.

Identifiers

HAL

tel-04245350

Documentary context

Documentary family

Thesis

Source-reported types

THESE

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

HAL · Record 1

• Document · https://hal.science/tel-04245350v1

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.