Análisis del Caso Aguinda vs. Chevron
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.56398/ajacieda.00259
- Authors
- Andrea Carolina Subía Cabrera · Pablo Ricardo Mendoza Escalante
- Reported year
- 2019
- Reported language
- es
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.650131+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universidad de Otavalo
Reported affiliation countries
EC
Documentary abstract — original language
El trabajo de investigación tuvo como propósito analizar comparativamente el caso Chevron (1993-2016) a través de distintos fallos internacionales en casos análogos; para ello, se utilizó la investigación del tipo documental comparativo-explicativo; la información recopilada se tomó de instrumentos normativos de derecho internacional y legislación nacional ecuatoriana aplicable. Como resultado de la investigación se constató que el caso constituye un precedente dentro del sistema jurídico ecuatoriano y que a pesar que los fallos relacionados al caso dentro del Ecuador fueron favorables su ejecutoriedad fue impedida ya que existen limitaciones de orden normativo para someter a la jurisdicción internacional a personas naturales o jurídicas, que han cometido violación de derechos humanos; lográndose determinar que la petrolera Chevron estaba consciente que su forma de explotación era ilegal y producía innumerables daños al medio ambiente en la amazonía ecuatoriana, lo que abriría la posibilidad de iniciar un proceso penal en su contra como responsable de los mismos; De esta manera, se pudo concluir que las víctimas del caso Chevron podrían solicitar ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, la reparación integral de sus derechos vulnerados y los derechos de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2938114715
- DOI
- 10.56398/ajacieda.00259
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::2ab187af862fd4aeed14446a4d895ae9
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- Document · http://dx.doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2938114715
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Andrea Carolina Subía Cabrera; Pablo Ricardo Mendoza Escalante. Análisis del Caso Aguinda vs. Chevron. 2019. https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Andrea Carolina Subía Cabrera; Pablo Ricardo Mendoza Escalante. (2019). Análisis del Caso Aguinda vs. Chevron. https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
- Chicago
- Andrea Carolina Subía Cabrera; Pablo Ricardo Mendoza Escalante. Análisis del Caso Aguinda vs. Chevron. 2019. https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
- ISO 690
- Andrea Carolina Subía Cabrera; Pablo Ricardo Mendoza Escalante. Análisis del Caso Aguinda vs. Chevron. 2019. https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Análisis del Caso Aguinda vs. Chevron. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-60453e1f22b800c331e0188eddbb82a7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version c90d089539fc6920 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:16.355605+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:16.355605+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:16.355605+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:16.355605+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:16.355605+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
ca6c8ae2043b960d · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
ccd6adb7a44d05b7 · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
c04e8e313a243b06 · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
c90d089539fc6920 · 2026-11-09T19:10:29.017639+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
Pablo Ricardo Mendoza Escalante
Source roles
Discovery source · http://dx.doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00259
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2938114715
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.