Indigenous constitutional practices as models for ecological governance: learning from the Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña and Buen Vivir movements
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
- Authors
- Ceyhun Elgin
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.583349+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Boğaziçi University
Reported affiliation countries
TR
Documentary abstract — original language
This article examines how Indigenous constitutional innovations in Ecuador and Bolivia are translated from constitutional text into everyday ecological governance. It develops a tripartite framework distinguishing subject innovations, who or what bears rights; jurisdictional innovations, which authorities may decide; and procedural innovations, how decisions are made. The analysis combines constitutional and documentary research with multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2018 and 2020, including 62 interviews and observation of 27 collective events. Ecuador’s recognition of the rights of nature primarily altered the legal subject, whereas Bolivia’s plurinational framework placed greater emphasis on jurisdiction and consultation. Ethnographic cases from Napo, Cotopaxi, La Paz, Cochabamba and the TIPNIS corridor show that these provisions sometimes reshape permitting, ecological monitoring and consultation when communities retain agenda-setting authority, evidentiary capacity and enforceable suspension mechanisms. Their effects are neither uniform nor necessarily transformative at the national scale: implementation remains constrained by extractive political economies, bureaucratic centralisation, uneven institutional capacity and risks of co-optation. The article therefore characterises these constitutional processes as incomplete and contested openings rather than completed ecological revolutions.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7220982379
- DOI
- 10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- BO · EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- Constructing the Rights of Nature: Constitutional Reform, Mobilization, and Environmental Protection in Ecuador · CITES
- openalex:w1991098428 · CITES
- openalex:w2015411663 · CITES
- openalex:w2041486751 · CITES
- openalex:w2067644009 · CITES
- openalex:w2094608150 · CITES
- openalex:w2122540403 · CITES
- openalex:w2132214484 · CITES
- openalex:w2138151821 · CITES
- openalex:w2155248714 · CITES
- The Ecuadorian Resource Dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or Development? · CITES
- openalex:w2266237531 · CITES
- openalex:w2410420192 · CITES
- openalex:w2552795637 · CITES
- Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail · CITES
- El constitucionalismo radical ambiental y la diversidad cultural en América Latina. Los derechos de la naturaleza y el buen vivir en Ecuador y Bolivia · CITES
- Mining for Mother Earth. Governmentalities, sacred waters and nature’s rights in Ecuador · CITES
- New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Ceyhun Elgin. Indigenous constitutional practices as models for ecological governance: learning from the Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña and Buen Vivir movements. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Ceyhun Elgin. (2026). Indigenous constitutional practices as models for ecological governance: learning from the Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña and Buen Vivir movements. https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
- Chicago
- Ceyhun Elgin. Indigenous constitutional practices as models for ecological governance: learning from the Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña and Buen Vivir movements. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
- ISO 690
- Ceyhun Elgin. Indigenous constitutional practices as models for ecological governance: learning from the Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña and Buen Vivir movements. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Indigenous constitutional practices as models for ecological governance: learning from the Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña and Buen Vivir movements. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-603eea9e215f90f2c87dd0e67ccf4341/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 5237890576d6ce51 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
f50d0b8fb2885b8b · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
a585cbf37dfe8cab · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
1a531140cae4a1a6 · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
5237890576d6ce51 · 2026-11-09T19:05:44.189616+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2026d000000103
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7220982379
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.