The Myth of the Teaching-Research Nexus
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.53300/001c.6312
- Authors
- Alex McKenzie · Lynden Griggs · Rick Snell · Gary D Meyers
- Reported year
- 2018
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
James Cook University · Murdoch University · University of Tasmania
Documentary abstract — original language
The wild law judgment project is a recent exciting collaborative project involving the rewriting and writing of both existing and hypothetical judgments from a wild law or Earth-centred perspective. In this article, the author reflects upon the performative implications of judicial impersonation and writing and rewriting judgments wildly. The performative nature of the project makes it a valuable teaching resource, in that it thereby offers a different and arguably more powerful challenge to the anthropocentric bias in law than that contained in more conventional forms of academic critique. Drawing upon insights contributed by academics who have used rewritten feminist judgments in their teaching, the author explores the pedagogical value and possibilities in the collection of wild law judgments. In light of the dire existential crisis which currently confronts Earth and its diverse lifeforms, there is a solid argument for ensuring that such an ‘outsider pedagogy’ is effectively incorporated into the mainstream curriculum in law schools.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2791895419
- DOI
- 10.53300/001c.6312
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::cc5b372bfd2f6c271993563ea21bc90f
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Alex McKenzie; Lynden Griggs; Rick Snell; Gary D Meyers. The Myth of the Teaching-Research Nexus. 2018. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6312
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Alex McKenzie; Lynden Griggs; Rick Snell; Gary D Meyers. (2018). The Myth of the Teaching-Research Nexus. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6312
- Chicago
- Alex McKenzie; Lynden Griggs; Rick Snell; Gary D Meyers. The Myth of the Teaching-Research Nexus. 2018. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6312
- ISO 690
- Alex McKenzie; Lynden Griggs; Rick Snell; Gary D Meyers. The Myth of the Teaching-Research Nexus. 2018. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6312
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The Myth of the Teaching-Research Nexus. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5e822d3e2cd98c9c07a7a7fec8f98e4a/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version a97c45a78b72067b · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.543299+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
57fd4169e6171d3a · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
0694979d672c86f8 · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
1709614c59cc4b32 · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
a97c45a78b72067b · 2026-11-09T19:11:05.421713+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6312
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2791895419
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.