Algorithmic Choice Architecture Reinforced by Influencer Messaging (Hypernudging Practice) as an Unfair Market Practice – Theoretical and Legal Reflections
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-5e71a76ff65fb03eabb8e897b31d6bd1
- Authors
- Szymon Słotwiński
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-14T02:06:24.476467+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-14T02:06:24.476467+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Szczecin
Reported affiliation countries
PL
Documentary abstract — original language
The dynamic development of the digital economy has led to a transformation of mechanisms of influencing consumer decisions. Online platforms, using algorithmic choice architectures and behavioural data analysis, have transformed marketing communications into a system of continuous, adaptive influencing (hypernudging), which involves ongoing adjustment of nudges to user behaviour. This mechanism is reinforced by the interplay of platform infrastructure and influencer content, which complicates the unambiguous legal classification of the message. The continuous, personalized, and often secret nature of this influence increases the risk of violating consumer autonomy and engaging in manipulative practices, raising doubts about the adequacy of regulations in place. This article analyzes whether hypernudging practices can be classified as unfair market practices.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W7167460608
- DOI
- 10.32084/tkp.10699
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Szymon Słotwiński. Algorithmic Choice Architecture Reinforced by Influencer Messaging (Hypernudging Practice) as an Unfair Market Practice – Theoretical and Legal Reflections. 2026. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.10699
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Szymon Słotwiński. (2026). Algorithmic Choice Architecture Reinforced by Influencer Messaging (Hypernudging Practice) as an Unfair Market Practice – Theoretical and Legal Reflections. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.10699
- Chicago
- Szymon Słotwiński. Algorithmic Choice Architecture Reinforced by Influencer Messaging (Hypernudging Practice) as an Unfair Market Practice – Theoretical and Legal Reflections. 2026. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.10699
- ISO 690
- Szymon Słotwiński. Algorithmic Choice Architecture Reinforced by Influencer Messaging (Hypernudging Practice) as an Unfair Market Practice – Theoretical and Legal Reflections. 2026. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.10699
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Algorithmic Choice Architecture Reinforced by Influencer Messaging (Hypernudging Practice) as an Unfair Market Practice – Theoretical and Legal Reflections. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5e71a76ff65fb03eabb8e897b31d6bd1/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.10699
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.