UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
Authors
Brian Rotich · Makindi Stanley · Esilaba Moses
Reported year
2020
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Chuka University · Egerton University · Machakos University

Documentary abstract — original language

Forest communities play a vital role in the conservation of forest resources. Understanding communities’ use, attitudes and perceptions of forests and management measures is significant in attaining conservation goals and reducing forest resource use conflicts. This study sought to assess local community’ forest resources use and their perception towards forest status, use and management. Data was collected through household surveys using semi-structured questionnaires, participant observation, Key Informant Interviews (KII), and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). A total of 112 respondents from three adjacent villages within 5 km from the forest boundary were randomly sampled for the household survey while descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Most (94.6%) of the households reported using products from forests. These products formed an integral part of the households’ energy needs, construction materials, medicine, income generation and daily dietary needs. Firewood was the most collected product from the forest (76.4%) whereas bush meat was the least (4.7%). There were mixed views on the forest management with more than half (54.5%) expressing dissatisfaction with the current management regime citing insecure land tenure system, inadequate integration of the community in forest management and corruption. There was perceived forest degradation due to illegal logging, illegal grazing, forest fires, climate change and encroachment for farming. For sustainable forest management practice therefore, there is a need for incorporating Indigenous knowledge (IK) in forest management plans and putting in place grievance address mechanisms to cater for the needs of local communities when designing forest policies and implementing forest restoration programs. Key words: Cherang’any hills, Community Forest Association, non-timber forest products, indigenous knowledge, sustainable forest management, forest restoration.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W3111755846
DOI
10.5897/ijbc2018.1448

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
KE
Natural entities mentioned
Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1528097611 · CITES
  • openalex:w1576856233 · CITES
  • openalex:w1598809329 · CITES
  • openalex:w1918072595 · CITES
  • openalex:w1964361781 · CITES
  • openalex:w1966841051 · CITES
  • openalex:w1974919465 · CITES
  • openalex:w204820159 · CITES
  • openalex:w2066887789 · CITES
  • openalex:w2068031289 · CITES
  • openalex:w2101612006 · CITES
  • openalex:w2122073847 · CITES
  • openalex:w2127300878 · CITES
  • openalex:w2141151109 · CITES
  • openalex:w2158558574 · CITES
  • openalex:w2188718596 · CITES
  • openalex:w2189523613 · CITES
  • openalex:w2218415022 · CITES
  • openalex:w2277014078 · CITES
  • openalex:w2298695073 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. (2020). Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
Chicago
Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
ISO 690
Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5b541111d53c1cced75bb6af86d1e4e1/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version c3391a6aa3bad4f9 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

ed96cd87191d3927 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00

fccc55928ad7d3b1 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00

d9d4fff2f9ec37c1 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00

c3391a6aa3bad4f9 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

KE ·

Chuka University

Egerton University

Machakos University

Brian Rotich

Esilaba Moses

Makindi Stanley

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3111755846

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library