Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
- Authors
- Brian Rotich · Makindi Stanley · Esilaba Moses
- Reported year
- 2020
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Chuka University · Egerton University · Machakos University
Documentary abstract — original language
Forest communities play a vital role in the conservation of forest resources. Understanding communities’ use, attitudes and perceptions of forests and management measures is significant in attaining conservation goals and reducing forest resource use conflicts. This study sought to assess local community’ forest resources use and their perception towards forest status, use and management. Data was collected through household surveys using semi-structured questionnaires, participant observation, Key Informant Interviews (KII), and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). A total of 112 respondents from three adjacent villages within 5 km from the forest boundary were randomly sampled for the household survey while descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Most (94.6%) of the households reported using products from forests. These products formed an integral part of the households’ energy needs, construction materials, medicine, income generation and daily dietary needs. Firewood was the most collected product from the forest (76.4%) whereas bush meat was the least (4.7%). There were mixed views on the forest management with more than half (54.5%) expressing dissatisfaction with the current management regime citing insecure land tenure system, inadequate integration of the community in forest management and corruption. There was perceived forest degradation due to illegal logging, illegal grazing, forest fires, climate change and encroachment for farming. For sustainable forest management practice therefore, there is a need for incorporating Indigenous knowledge (IK) in forest management plans and putting in place grievance address mechanisms to cater for the needs of local communities when designing forest policies and implementing forest restoration programs. Key words: Cherang’any hills, Community Forest Association, non-timber forest products, indigenous knowledge, sustainable forest management, forest restoration.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W3111755846
- DOI
- 10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- KE
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1528097611 · CITES
- openalex:w1576856233 · CITES
- openalex:w1598809329 · CITES
- openalex:w1918072595 · CITES
- openalex:w1964361781 · CITES
- openalex:w1966841051 · CITES
- openalex:w1974919465 · CITES
- openalex:w204820159 · CITES
- openalex:w2066887789 · CITES
- openalex:w2068031289 · CITES
- openalex:w2101612006 · CITES
- openalex:w2122073847 · CITES
- openalex:w2127300878 · CITES
- openalex:w2141151109 · CITES
- openalex:w2158558574 · CITES
- openalex:w2188718596 · CITES
- openalex:w2189523613 · CITES
- openalex:w2218415022 · CITES
- openalex:w2277014078 · CITES
- openalex:w2298695073 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. (2020). Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
- Chicago
- Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
- ISO 690
- Brian Rotich; Makindi Stanley; Esilaba Moses. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5b541111d53c1cced75bb6af86d1e4e1/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version c3391a6aa3bad4f9 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
ed96cd87191d3927 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
fccc55928ad7d3b1 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
d9d4fff2f9ec37c1 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
c3391a6aa3bad4f9 · 2026-11-09T19:16:34.793038+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
KE ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2018.1448
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3111755846
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.