UDTR Legal Library

UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Constitucionalismo verde y derechos de la naturaleza en América Latina: bloque ambiental, Amazonia y brechas de eficacia

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.37885/260822671
Authors
Ariz Humerez Alvez
Reported year
2026
Reported language
es · und
Source type
book-chapter
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.691519+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-10T16:58:51.292435+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

El constitucionalismo verde latinoamericano ha transformado la protección ambiental al incorporar el ambiente sano, los derechos de la naturaleza y los principios vinculados al buen vivir dentro del orden jurídico. Este artículo analiza sus fundamentos y la configuración del bloque de constitucionalidad ambiental, con especial atención a Ecuador, Bolivia, Colombia y Brasil. Se realizó una revisión documental cualitativa de constituciones, leyes, tratados internacionales, jurisprudencia y literatura especializada. El análisis muestra cuatro desarrollos diferenciados: el reconocimiento constitucional de los derechos de la naturaleza en Ecuador; su construcción legislativa en Bolivia mediante las leyes de la Madre Tierra; el avance jurisprudencial de Colombia al reconocer como sujetos de derechos al río Atrato y a la Amazonia; y la protección constitucional ambiental de Brasil, todavía centrada en la titularidad humana. La OC-23/17 de la Corte Interamericana, el Acuerdo de Escazú y la opinión consultiva de la Corte Internacional de Justicia de 2025 fortalecen este entramado multinivel. Sin embargo, las cifras recientes de deforestación e incendios revelan una distancia persistente entre el desarrollo jurídico y la conservación efectiva del bosque. Esta contradicción se relaciona con la dependencia extractiva, la debilidad institucional y las dificultades de acceso a la justicia. Se concluye que la eficacia del constitucionalismo verde depende de la aplicación de los principios de precaución, progresividad y no regresión, del reconocimiento de la gobernanza indígena y de la adopción de políticas económicas compatibles con la permanencia de la Amazonia.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W7212146379
DOI
10.37885/260822671
OPENAIRE
doi_________::0649b5b39aa33900f4746d328b559ad4
ISBN
6561552555 · 9786561552554

Documentary context

Documentary family
Book chapter
Source-reported types
Part of book or chapter of book · book-chapter
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
BO · BR · CO · EC
Publishers
Editora Científica Digital
Natural entities mentioned
River · Forest · Mother Earth

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Book bibliographic description

Publisher
Editora Científica Digital

Access status unknown

Sources

Crossref · Record 1

OpenAIRE · Record 1

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Documentary source reported
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Documentary source reported
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded
Instrument versions and official source

Source unresolved

Documentary identity verification only: a link or date establishes neither full-text verification, legal effect nor current force.

Possible duplicate awaiting documentary verification.

Status from the preserved documentary extraction: Unestablished

Cite this reference

Ariz Humerez Alvez. Constitucionalismo verde y derechos de la naturaleza en América Latina: bloque ambiental, Amazonia y brechas de eficacia. 2026. Editora Científica Digital. https://doi.org/10.37885/260822671

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Ariz Humerez Alvez. (2026). Constitucionalismo verde y derechos de la naturaleza en América Latina: bloque ambiental, Amazonia y brechas de eficacia. Editora Científica Digital. https://doi.org/10.37885/260822671
Chicago
Ariz Humerez Alvez. Constitucionalismo verde y derechos de la naturaleza en América Latina: bloque ambiental, Amazonia y brechas de eficacia. Editora Científica Digital. 2026. https://doi.org/10.37885/260822671
ISO 690
Ariz Humerez Alvez. Constitucionalismo verde y derechos de la naturaleza en América Latina: bloque ambiental, Amazonia y brechas de eficacia. 2026. Editora Científica Digital. https://doi.org/10.37885/260822671

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Constitucionalismo verde y derechos de la naturaleza en América Latina: bloque ambiental, Amazonia y brechas de eficacia. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-510a5edcf427574adaee42a4b006f5bf/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 25e9af8c5a42ca41 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
Crossref · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:25.291522+00:00
Authors
Crossref · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:25.291522+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Year
Crossref · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:25.291522+00:00
Identifiers
Crossref · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:25.291522+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Source URL
Crossref · source · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:25.291522+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.292435+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

53e1601e6d0ad250 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00

fa8b9ea71a68bf09 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00

d5ec45381cf747b4 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.377471+00:00

225f20fab4081758 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.292435+00:00

25e9af8c5a42ca41 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.292435+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

BO · BR · CO · EC ·

Ariz Humerez Alvez

Source roles

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.37885/260822671

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7212146379

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library