How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1505/146554817822330506
- Authors
- P. Cronkleton · Yustina Artati · Himlal Baral · Kiran Paudyal · M.R. Banjane · J.L. Liu · T.Y. Tu · L. Putzel · Emiru Birhane · Habtemariam Kassa
- Reported year
- 2017
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Center for International Forestry Research · Mekelle University · Norwegian University of Life Sciences · Renmin University of China · The University of Melbourne · Tsinghua University
Documentary abstract — original language
To promote forest landscape restoration (FLR), national governments have embarked on far reaching policy reforms to reclassify lands targeted for restoration, designate legitimate forest stewards and define acceptable land use practices, responsibilities and benefits. Policy reforms intended to influence forest management behavior face complex challenges but policy makers can learn from past experience to better design forest restoration initiatives that address forest governance. This paper attempts to distill lessons by examining national reform processes and their local manifestations in diverse socio-political and environmental contexts. Specifically, we compare local dynamics in Nepal, China and Ethiopia to illustrate how distinct policy reform processes intended to promote FLR changed governance institutions and encouraged local participation. These cases demonstrate how policy reforms, particularly those targeting property rights, have influenced local participation in forest restoration efforts, and modified land use behavior to increase forest cover as well as the benefits local households received from forests.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2777633939
- DOI
- 10.1505/146554817822330506
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- CN · ET · NP
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest · Landscape
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1500864233 · CITES
- openalex:w151963733 · CITES
- openalex:w1600429647 · CITES
- openalex:w177314108 · CITES
- openalex:w1849444284 · CITES
- Frontiers of Commodification: State Lands and Their Formalization · CITES
- openalex:w1915154712 · CITES
- openalex:w1962371317 · CITES
- openalex:w1985395139 · CITES
- openalex:w1988016383 · CITES
- openalex:w1995512741 · CITES
- openalex:w2006031600 · CITES
- openalex:w2009803776 · CITES
- openalex:w2014173093 · CITES
- openalex:w2017362755 · CITES
- openalex:w2037082473 · CITES
- openalex:w2038497072 · CITES
- Techno-bureaucratic Doxa and Challenges for Deliberative Governance: The Case of Community Forestry Policy and Practice in Nepal · CITES
- openalex:w2062159276 · CITES
- openalex:w2066887789 · CITES
4 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
P. Cronkleton; Yustina Artati; Himlal Baral; Kiran Paudyal; M.R. Banjane; J.L. Liu; T.Y. Tu; L. Putzel; Emiru Birhane; Habtemariam Kassa. How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822330506
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- P. Cronkleton; Yustina Artati; Himlal Baral; Kiran Paudyal; M.R. Banjane; J.L. Liu; T.Y. Tu; L. Putzel; Emiru Birhane; Habtemariam Kassa. (2017). How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822330506
- Chicago
- P. Cronkleton; Yustina Artati; Himlal Baral; Kiran Paudyal; M.R. Banjane; J.L. Liu; T.Y. Tu; L. Putzel; Emiru Birhane; Habtemariam Kassa. How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822330506
- ISO 690
- P. Cronkleton; Yustina Artati; Himlal Baral; Kiran Paudyal; M.R. Banjane; J.L. Liu; T.Y. Tu; L. Putzel; Emiru Birhane; Habtemariam Kassa. How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822330506
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-399fb2ece349f1336d397a9a4fbfdb7d/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version aadac6e4d52a459a · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
a3a2865ca29716ea · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
ccbfc2f033795bd6 · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
2e1492d5b901729e · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
aadac6e4d52a459a · 2026-11-09T19:15:02.383809+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Center for International Forestry Research
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822330506
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2777633939
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.