UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Invasion of coastal Acacia communities by Chrysanthemoides

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.25911/5d78d8f86e555
Authors
Weiss, Paul William
Reported year
1983
Reported language
und · en_AU
Source type
Thesis (PhD)
First detected
2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Many of the distributed coastal sand-dune communities in New South Wales are being invaded by the South Africa shrub, Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. Rotundata (boneseed, bitou bush). In some stands, this has resulted in displacement of the previous dominant, Acacia longifolia var. Sophorae (coastal wattle). In South Africa, closely related Acacia ssp. Are invasive, so a study of both Chrysanthemoides and Acacia provided a means of better understanding the invasion process. The main factors in the success of Chrysanthemoides in Australia are flowering mainly from autumn to spring, a yearly output of over 4000 seeds m-2 , efficient dispersal particularly by birds, and low predation. Acacia flowers only in spring and produces c. 100 seeds m-2, which are poorly dispersed and highly predated. Although remaining Acacia seeds have greater longevity in the soil than Chrysanthemoides, in established stands there are c. 60 times more viable Chryssanthemoides seeds in the soil than Acacia. By contrast in South Africa lower predation of the Australian species in up to 50 times more Acacia seeds than of the native Chrysanthemoides. In unburnt areas in Australia there were 500 times more seedlings of Chrysanthemoides than Acacia. Differences in seedling strategies were apparent in that Chrysanthemoides was able to avoid water stress to some extent by rapid root development and early closure of stomates as leaf water potential dropped. By contrast, Acacia was more typical of Australian sclerophylls and was able to tolerate lower leaf water potentials and under even severe water stress had low mortality except in mixtures where the greater transpiration of Chrysanthemoides resulted in similar mortality of both species. Chrysanthemoides outcompeted Acacia in terms of biomass when well-watered but not under water stress. Under controlled conditions, the potential invasiveness of Acacia was demonstrated in its having the higher rate of CO2 assimilation per unit leaf area but both species had similar rates in the field and Chrysanthemoides had the greater leaf area. Regenerative strategies of the two species after fire also differed. In unburnt areas there was a bank of persistent, slow growing seedlings of Chrysanthemoides but very few seedlings of Acacia or other native species. Fire killed adult acacias but anhanced germination which resulted in a 13-fold increase in subsequent seedling density. By contrast, 26% of adult Chrysanthemoides resprouted and while 30% of seeds were killed subsequent Chrysanthemoides seedlings still outnumbered those of Acacia by some 20 times. Seedlings of both species responded by greater growth rates in burnt areas but Chrysanthemoides was more precocious in that flowering and seedling occurred within 12 months of emergence. Measures to control Chrysanthemoides by a program of double-burning were successful in limiting resprouting to 5% or less of plants but a problem still remained of seedlings which emerged from deeply buried seeds. Thus other measures such as biological control for which there is ample potential need to be assessed.

Identifiers

DOI
10.25911/5d78d8f86e555
HANDLE
1885/9920
OAI
oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/9920

Documentary context

Documentary family
Thesis
Source-reported types
Thesis (PhD)
Natural entities mentioned
Species

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

Repository · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Weiss, Paul William. Invasion of coastal Acacia communities by Chrysanthemoides. 1983. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d78d8f86e555

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Weiss, Paul William. (1983). Invasion of coastal Acacia communities by Chrysanthemoides. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d78d8f86e555
Chicago
Weiss, Paul William. Invasion of coastal Acacia communities by Chrysanthemoides. 1983. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d78d8f86e555
ISO 690
Weiss, Paul William. Invasion of coastal Acacia communities by Chrysanthemoides. 1983. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d78d8f86e555

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Invasion of coastal Acacia communities by Chrysanthemoides. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3736b7cd7231e7eb4d656bbb0219e84b/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 7f7b56820d4bab31 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00
Authors
Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00
Year
Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00
Identifiers
Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00
Source URL
Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

13c31743e5dd7ae5 · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00

6b813d3c29e2eee9 · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00

00784952f6f7e148 · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00

7f7b56820d4bab31 · 2026-11-09T19:08:45.201016+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Weiss, Paul William

Source roles

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.25911/5d78d8f86e555

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://hdl.handle.net/1885/9920

Institutional bibliographic repository · https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/1bfa211c-e9ee-4574-bbd0-8137fda6b173/download

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library