Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand intervening)
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.4324/9781315618319-17
- Authors
- —
- Reported year
- 2017
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- book-chapter
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
This chapter outlines the context surrounding the Whaling in Antarctic case and identifies the problematic nature of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whalings (ICRW's) exception for 'scientific whaling'. It employs the second method of rewriting judgments outlined by Judge Preston: redrafting the ICRW and then rewriting the International Court of Justice (ICJ) whaling case based on these reforms. The chapter examines the Earth Charter, Earth jurisprudence literature and relevant international environmental agreements to reframe the ICRW. The Whaling in Antarctic decision by the ICJ found that Japan's permits for whaling were not in compliance with the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling 1946 (ICRW). The Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA II) Research Plan has four research objectives: Monitoring of the Antarctic ecosystem, Modelling competition among whale species and future management objectives, Elucidation of temporal and spatial changes in stock structure, and improving the management procedure for Antarctic minke whale stocks.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W3169777504
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781315618319-17
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- book-chapter
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- AU · JP · NZ
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem · Species
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand intervening). 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-17
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- (2017). Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand intervening). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-17
- Chicago
- Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand intervening). 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-17
- ISO 690
- Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand intervening). 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-17
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan: New Zealand intervening). Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-32f53fad89bf4ebe5f3a4a78e0b00a16/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 330a041b4cb281ad · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
d36bad696b38e411 · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
a61407f8922ad818 · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
414e274832dc80dc · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
330a041b4cb281ad · 2026-11-09T19:11:10.990548+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618319-17
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3169777504
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.