Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
- Authors
- Ayesha Khosla · Prodyut Bhattacharya
- Reported year
- 2020
- Reported language
- en · und
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Corresponding author.; University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka Sector 16-C, Delhi, India · Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University · University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka Sector 16-C, Delhi, India
Documentary abstract — original language
The Scheduled Tribe and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA) was implemented in India in 2008, to recognize forest rights of forest-dwelling tribal communities as a historical reparation of injustices faced by them. In over a decade of implementation majority of the rights recognised are in the category of Individual forest rights (IFR), to improve the socio-economic condition and put tribal development in a sustainable pattern. But only a handful of studies assess the post rights recognition impacts of FRA. This study uses composite index to assess the impacts on the socio-economic condition of the scheduled tribes and the condition of the land vested as forest rights. The composite Indexes were constructed using the methodology given by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The socio-economic composite index consisted of 8 parameters and 15 indicators and the Index for vegetation condition used four indicators. To validate the Index, evaluation was undertaken in the North Eastern state of Tripura. A total of 300 households and 108 vegetation plots from 12 villages were sampled to generate primary data. The evaluation successfully classified 25% of the villages as having ‘very good’ socio-economic and vegetation conditions. The status of each parameter including their inter-linkages and their impact on the overall socio-economic and vegetation conditions was also delineated. The major factor that impact the conditions were identified as size of land holding, assistance for development, household income, use of alternative sustainable practices, and lack of skill building. Analysis of the relationship between socio-economic and vegetation conditions pointed towards deterioration of vegetation condition as socio-economic conditions improved and indicated the existence of other possible factors that impact the post right conditions. This study successfully marks the advent into the sphere of post-recognition impacts of FRA. The use of Composite Index can enhance post implementation assessments and guide future policies and course of actions. Index can be adapted to uniformly assess FRA's performance in India, or any forest policy for devolution of rights around the world.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W3049414263
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
- ISSN
- 2666-7193
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
- Document · http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719320300236
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3049414263
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1484750607 · CITES
- openalex:w1503763123 · CITES
- openalex:w1517226554 · CITES
- openalex:w1524040504 · CITES
- openalex:w1529710403 · CITES
- openalex:w1551316950 · CITES
- openalex:w1656965725 · CITES
- openalex:w1762376068 · CITES
- openalex:w1938845323 · CITES
- openalex:w1974571698 · CITES
- openalex:w1981611556 · CITES
- openalex:w2001994011 · CITES
- openalex:w2002053170 · CITES
- openalex:w2038072278 · CITES
- openalex:w2077263782 · CITES
- openalex:w2078596313 · CITES
- openalex:w2096037127 · CITES
- openalex:w2103651949 · CITES
- openalex:w2135206046 · CITES
- openalex:w2143286669 · CITES
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. (2020). Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
- Chicago
- Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
- ISO 690
- Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2ff18f997749f4ca155e7849026aa262/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 7044c95794d7b27e · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00 - Authors
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00 - Year
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00 - Identifiers
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
4f6b7b4dbf2897e9 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
7887bfe8569788a9 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
5c1fd7dd6fd48349 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
7044c95794d7b27e · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
IN ·
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
Bibliographic / original publication source · http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719320300236
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3049414263
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.