UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
Authors
Ayesha Khosla · Prodyut Bhattacharya
Reported year
2020
Reported language
en · und
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Corresponding author.; University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka Sector 16-C, Delhi, India · Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University · University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka Sector 16-C, Delhi, India

Documentary abstract — original language

The Scheduled Tribe and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA) was implemented in India in 2008, to recognize forest rights of forest-dwelling tribal communities as a historical reparation of injustices faced by them. In over a decade of implementation majority of the rights recognised are in the category of Individual forest rights (IFR), to improve the socio-economic condition and put tribal development in a sustainable pattern. But only a handful of studies assess the post rights recognition impacts of FRA. This study uses composite index to assess the impacts on the socio-economic condition of the scheduled tribes and the condition of the land vested as forest rights. The composite Indexes were constructed using the methodology given by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The socio-economic composite index consisted of 8 parameters and 15 indicators and the Index for vegetation condition used four indicators. To validate the Index, evaluation was undertaken in the North Eastern state of Tripura. A total of 300 households and 108 vegetation plots from 12 villages were sampled to generate primary data. The evaluation successfully classified 25% of the villages as having ‘very good’ socio-economic and vegetation conditions. The status of each parameter including their inter-linkages and their impact on the overall socio-economic and vegetation conditions was also delineated. The major factor that impact the conditions were identified as size of land holding, assistance for development, household income, use of alternative sustainable practices, and lack of skill building. Analysis of the relationship between socio-economic and vegetation conditions pointed towards deterioration of vegetation condition as socio-economic conditions improved and indicated the existence of other possible factors that impact the post right conditions. This study successfully marks the advent into the sphere of post-recognition impacts of FRA. The use of Composite Index can enhance post implementation assessments and guide future policies and course of actions. Index can be adapted to uniformly assess FRA's performance in India, or any forest policy for devolution of rights around the world.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W3049414263
DOI
10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
ISSN
2666-7193

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
IN
Natural entities mentioned
Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

DOAJ · Record 1 · Record 2

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w1484750607 · CITES
  • openalex:w1503763123 · CITES
  • openalex:w1517226554 · CITES
  • openalex:w1524040504 · CITES
  • openalex:w1529710403 · CITES
  • openalex:w1551316950 · CITES
  • openalex:w1656965725 · CITES
  • openalex:w1762376068 · CITES
  • openalex:w1938845323 · CITES
  • openalex:w1974571698 · CITES
  • openalex:w1981611556 · CITES
  • openalex:w2001994011 · CITES
  • openalex:w2002053170 · CITES
  • openalex:w2038072278 · CITES
  • openalex:w2077263782 · CITES
  • openalex:w2078596313 · CITES
  • openalex:w2096037127 · CITES
  • openalex:w2103651949 · CITES
  • openalex:w2135206046 · CITES
  • openalex:w2143286669 · CITES

2 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. (2020). Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
Chicago
Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023
ISO 690
Ayesha Khosla; Prodyut Bhattacharya. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Use of composite index to critically assess the post rights recognition impact of Forest Rights Act, 2006: A case study from the tribal state of Tripura, India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2ff18f997749f4ca155e7849026aa262/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 7044c95794d7b27e · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Authors
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Year
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Identifiers
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Source URL
DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.144311+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

4f6b7b4dbf2897e9 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00

7887bfe8569788a9 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00

5c1fd7dd6fd48349 · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00

7044c95794d7b27e · 2026-11-09T19:19:11.141304+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

IN ·

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

Ayesha Khosla

Prodyut Bhattacharya

Source roles

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100023

Bibliographic / original publication source · http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719320300236

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3049414263

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library